Optimizing and Coordinating R&D Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain Under Tax Incentives

To improve firms' enthusiasm for R&D investment, governments worldwide have implemented a series of tax incentives, such as the Super Tax Deduction policy (STDpolicy), and the Preferential Income Tax policy (PIT-policy). This paper considers a decentralized supply chain, where a supplier conducts R&D activity to improve the quality of its product and then sells it to a retailer who faces a price and quality sensitive demand. We analyze the R&D investment strategy and the corresponding pricing decisions of supply chain players under the two tax incentives. Interestingly, we show that the two tax incentives can not always improve the R&D investment enthusiasm of the supplier. Furthermore, the existence of the PIT-policy poses a technical challenge for coordination, as the wholesale price may not be offset when calculating the total after-tax profits of the two players. We develop a coordination mechanism with three parameters, which has sufficient flexibility to achieve Pareto improvement for both players. We also extend the model by considering continuous product quality, collaborative R&D investment, stochastic market demand, capitalconstrained supplier, respectively, and obtain some useful insights

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2025.3581023
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing and Coordinating R&D Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain Under Tax Incentives

Wei Rui-yuan, Hong Fu, Jianping Gao, Wei Xiao
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
4.57
article

Optimizing and Coordinating R&D Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain Under Tax Incentives

Wei Rui-yuan, Hong Fu, Jianping Gao, Wei Xiao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To improve firms' enthusiasm for R&D investment, governments worldwide have implemented a series of tax incentives, such as the Super Tax Deduction policy (STDpolicy), and the Preferential Income Tax policy (PIT-policy). This paper considers a decentralized supply chain, where a supplier conducts R&D activity to improve the quality of its product and then sells it to a retailer who faces a price and quality sensitive demand. We analyze the R&D investment strategy and the corresponding pricing decisions of supply chain players under the two tax incentives. Interestingly, we show that the two tax incentives can not always improve the R&D investment enthusiasm of the supplier. Furthermore, the existence of the PIT-policy poses a technical challenge for coordination, as the wholesale price may not be offset when calculating the total after-tax profits of the two players. We develop a coordination mechanism with three parameters, which has sufficient flexibility to achieve Pareto improvement for both players. We also extend the model by considering continuous product quality, collaborative R&D investment, stochastic market demand, capitalconstrained supplier, respectively, and obtain some useful insights

IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementVol. 72
Hefei University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
4.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.