Noncloud Contaminants in Agricultural Soil Monitoring: Quantifying Spectral Distortions From Plastic Covers, Pylons, and Aircraft Overpasses

The detection and exclusion of clouds and their shadows have been the primary focus of pixel contamination in spaceborne agricultural soil monitoring. However, contaminants affecting specific parts of agricultural fields, such as stationary features (large pylons and artificial soil cover) and dynamic sources (pylon shadows and passing aircraft with contrails), have been overlooked despite their importance in precision agriculture. This study investigates these underexplored sources of pixel contamination and their implications for agricultural soil monitoring. Using bare soil data from 2017 to 2023 and focusing on the field preparation period from mid-April to late May, we analysed the effects of artificial soil cover, transmission tower shadows, and aircraft overflights on bare soil reflectance. These pixel contaminants significantly altered surface reflectance compared to clear bare soil pixels, with P <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\leq$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.0001 for artificially covered, P <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\leq$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.01 for aircraft-impacted and P <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\leq$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.05 for tower shadowed pixels. Artificial cover increased the surface reflectance of bare soil by 10-50% in the visible and near- infrared bands, with a smaller increase of 5% in the shortwave infrared bands. pylon shadows reduced the surface reflectance by up to 5% within a 10m buffer around the shadow. Aircraft footprints caused a sixfold increase in reflectance, with contrails affecting large areas and increasing reflectance by up to 30%. Important spectral indices for bare soil analyses were significantly affected by artificial cover, but not always by shadows or aircraft impact. The analysis provides insights into the spectral anomalies caused by pixel contaminants and highlights the need to account for such influences to improve the accuracy of spaceborne agricultural soil monitoring, particularly in small parcels or field zones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2025.3581045
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Noncloud Contaminants in Agricultural Soil Monitoring: Quantifying Spectral Distortions From Plastic Covers, Pylons, and Aircraft Overpasses

Anne Gobin, Elsy Ibrahim
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
article

Noncloud Contaminants in Agricultural Soil Monitoring: Quantifying Spectral Distortions From Plastic Covers, Pylons, and Aircraft Overpasses

Anne Gobin, Elsy Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

The detection and exclusion of clouds and their shadows have been the primary focus of pixel contamination in spaceborne agricultural soil monitoring. However, contaminants affecting specific parts of agricultural fields, such as stationary features (large pylons and artificial soil cover) and dynamic sources (pylon shadows and passing aircraft with contrails), have been overlooked despite their importance in precision agriculture. This study investigates these underexplored sources of pixel contamination and their implications for agricultural soil monitoring. Using bare soil data from 2017 to 2023 and focusing on the field preparation period from mid-April to late May, we analysed the effects of artificial soil cover, transmission tower shadows, and aircraft overflights on bare soil reflectance. These pixel contaminants significantly altered surface reflectance compared to clear bare soil pixels, with P <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\leq$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.0001 for artificially covered, P <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\leq$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.01 for aircraft-impacted and P <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\leq$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.05 for tower shadowed pixels. Artificial cover increased the surface reflectance of bare soil by 10-50% in the visible and near- infrared bands, with a smaller increase of 5% in the shortwave infrared bands. pylon shadows reduced the surface reflectance by up to 5% within a 10m buffer around the shadow. Aircraft footprints caused a sixfold increase in reflectance, with contrails affecting large areas and increasing reflectance by up to 30%. Important spectral indices for bare soil analyses were significantly affected by artificial cover, but not always by shadows or aircraft impact. The analysis provides insights into the spectral anomalies caused by pixel contaminants and highlights the need to account for such influences to improve the accuracy of spaceborne agricultural soil monitoring, particularly in small parcels or field zones.

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingVol. 18
Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.