Diagnostic accuracy of predictive indices for assessing liver steatosis and fibrosis as compared to transient elastography in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Introduction. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global public health challenge. Study data show that all-cause mortality rates increase significantly with liver fibrosis F ≥ 2; therefore, predictive indices (PI) are critical for the primary diagnosis of liver fibrosis and steatosis. Aim. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of steatosis (FLI, ST) and liver fibrosis (FIB-4, APRI, NFS) PI for detecting liver fibrosis and steatosis as compared with transient elastography (TE) in patients with NAFLD. Materials and methods. A total of 142 patients with NAFLD were included in the study. The computation of the above PI, TE-CAP was performed for all patients. The diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis and steatosis PI was compared with TE using a respondent-driven sampling. All patients underwent hand grip strength (HGS) measurement using a hand dynamometer. Results. The FIB-4 (cut-off point > 1.94) showed AUC = 0.643, a sensitivity of 34.78% and specificity of 90.62 for differentiation between severe LF and cirrhosis (F3-F4). The APRI (cut-off point > 0.44) showed AUC = 0.615, a sensitivity of 54.35%, and specificity of 67.71 for differentiation between severe LF and cirrhosis (F3-F4). The NFS (cut-off point > 26.38) showed AUC = 0.681, a sensitivity of 58.7% and specificity of 79.1 for differentiation between severe LF and cirrhosis (F3-F4). The ST (cut-off point > 0.054) showed AUC = 0.713, a sensitivity of 45.63% and specificity of 87.18 for differentiation of severe liver steatosis (S2-S3). For HGS, a significant inverse correlation between HGS, based on hand dynamometer values, and the quantitative indicator of liver parenchyma density, based on TE (kPa) values, was found (r = -0.2879, p = 0.0005). Conclusions. The FIB-4 and NFS indices showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for detecting severe AF and cirrhosis (F3-F4). The FLI and ST indices demonstrated the significant diagnostic accuracy for detecting severe liver steatosis (S2-S3). HGS can be used as an additional non-invasive method for the differentiation of patients with severe fibrosis and cirrhosis (F3-F4).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-225
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy of predictive indices for assessing liver steatosis and fibrosis as compared to transient elastography in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

И. В. Маев, Alla K. Kulieva, Д. Н. Андреев, R. M. Umyarova et al.
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Diagnostic accuracy of predictive indices for assessing liver steatosis and fibrosis as compared to transient elastography in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

И. В. Маев, Alla K. Kulieva, Д. Н. Андреев, R. M. Umyarova, Д. Т. Дичева
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global public health challenge. Study data show that all-cause mortality rates increase significantly with liver fibrosis F ≥ 2; therefore, predictive indices (PI) are critical for the primary diagnosis of liver fibrosis and steatosis. Aim. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of steatosis (FLI, ST) and liver fibrosis (FIB-4, APRI, NFS) PI for detecting liver fibrosis and steatosis as compared with transient elastography (TE) in patients with NAFLD. Materials and methods. A total of 142 patients with NAFLD were included in the study. The computation of the above PI, TE-CAP was performed for all patients. The diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis and steatosis PI was compared with TE using a respondent-driven sampling. All patients underwent hand grip strength (HGS) measurement using a hand dynamometer. Results. The FIB-4 (cut-off point > 1.94) showed AUC = 0.643, a sensitivity of 34.78% and specificity of 90.62 for differentiation between severe LF and cirrhosis (F3-F4). The APRI (cut-off point > 0.44) showed AUC = 0.615, a sensitivity of 54.35%, and specificity of 67.71 for differentiation between severe LF and cirrhosis (F3-F4). The NFS (cut-off point > 26.38) showed AUC = 0.681, a sensitivity of 58.7% and specificity of 79.1 for differentiation between severe LF and cirrhosis (F3-F4). The ST (cut-off point > 0.054) showed AUC = 0.713, a sensitivity of 45.63% and specificity of 87.18 for differentiation of severe liver steatosis (S2-S3). For HGS, a significant inverse correlation between HGS, based on hand dynamometer values, and the quantitative indicator of liver parenchyma density, based on TE (kPa) values, was found (r = -0.2879, p = 0.0005). Conclusions. The FIB-4 and NFS indices showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for detecting severe AF and cirrhosis (F3-F4). The FLI and ST indices demonstrated the significant diagnostic accuracy for detecting severe liver steatosis (S2-S3). HGS can be used as an additional non-invasive method for the differentiation of patients with severe fibrosis and cirrhosis (F3-F4).

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council(8)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.