Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health

BackgroundUnhealthy alcohol use is a leading cause of preventable deaths and is associated with many social and health problems.Less than a third of people who visit primary care providers in the US are asked about or ever discuss alcohol use with a health professional.The first aim of the Stop Unhealthy Alcohol Use Now (STUN) trial was to evaluate the effect of primary care practice facilitation on uptake of evidencebased screening and brief counseling for unhealthy alcohol use.Methods STUN was a hybrid implementation effectiveness trial that enrolled primary care practices across the state of North Carolina.Enrolled practices received twelve months of practice facilitation, including quality improvement coaching, electronic health record (EHR) support (e.g., using available tools, creating smart phrases or flowsheets, retrieving data), and training on screening and counseling for unhealthy alcohol use.The primary outcome measures included the change from three months prior to baseline through the second quarter (i.e., months 4-6) in the number and percentage of adult patients (1) who were screened for unhealthy alcohol use and (2) who received brief counseling after a positive screening result.For count data, we used negative binomial mixed-effects models to assess trajectories; models accounted for clinic size.For percentage data, we utilized linear mixed models.Findings Twenty one practices serving 54,294 patients reported implementation effectiveness data.Screening rates increased significantly, from an average of 200 to over 400 adults per quarter per practice (from 20% to 50% of adult patients, p < 0.01).Additionally, the number and percentage of patients who received a brief intervention after a positive screening result increased from 0 to 12 adults per quarter per practice (from 0% to 40% of adults with a positive screen, p<0.01).After month 6, assessment of the implementation effectiveness outcomes showed reasonable sustainment.There was significant variability across participating practices for screening and counseling outcomes.Implications for D&I Research: Our findings provide evidence for the positive effect of practice facilitation on uptake of evidence-based screening and counseling for unhealthy alcohol use when delivered to small to medium-sized primary care practices.

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-025-01433-8
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health

4 links
Implementation Science
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health

article en

Abstract

BackgroundUnhealthy alcohol use is a leading cause of preventable deaths and is associated with many social and health problems.Less than a third of people who visit primary care providers in the US are asked about or ever discuss alcohol use with a health professional.The first aim of the Stop Unhealthy Alcohol Use Now (STUN) trial was to evaluate the effect of primary care practice facilitation on uptake of evidencebased screening and brief counseling for unhealthy alcohol use.Methods STUN was a hybrid implementation effectiveness trial that enrolled primary care practices across the state of North Carolina.Enrolled practices received twelve months of practice facilitation, including quality improvement coaching, electronic health record (EHR) support (e.g., using available tools, creating smart phrases or flowsheets, retrieving data), and training on screening and counseling for unhealthy alcohol use.The primary outcome measures included the change from three months prior to baseline through the second quarter (i.e., months 4-6) in the number and percentage of adult patients (1) who were screened for unhealthy alcohol use and (2) who received brief counseling after a positive screening result.For count data, we used negative binomial mixed-effects models to assess trajectories; models accounted for clinic size.For percentage data, we utilized linear mixed models.Findings Twenty one practices serving 54,294 patients reported implementation effectiveness data.Screening rates increased significantly, from an average of 200 to over 400 adults per quarter per practice (from 20% to 50% of adult patients, p < 0.01).Additionally, the number and percentage of patients who received a brief intervention after a positive screening result increased from 0 to 12 adults per quarter per practice (from 0% to 40% of adults with a positive screen, p<0.01).After month 6, assessment of the implementation effectiveness outcomes showed reasonable sustainment.There was significant variability across participating practices for screening and counseling outcomes.Implications for D&I Research: Our findings provide evidence for the positive effect of practice facilitation on uptake of evidence-based screening and counseling for unhealthy alcohol use when delivered to small to medium-sized primary care practices.

Implementation ScienceVol. 20(S1)
Northwestern University, University of Washington, Feinberg School of Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.