An experimental investigation of the calculus of consent

We conduct a laboratory experiment to investigate group decision-making, inspired by a model from Buchanan and Tullock’s The Calculus of Consent . Unlike previous researchers, we move beyond simple majority and unanimity rules, allowing groups to choose voting rules endogenously. The results of our experiment are consistent with the Buchanan–Tullock model. In particular, we confirm a tendency toward less restrictive voting rules when decision-making costs are high and external costs are low. We also find that less restrictive voting rules lead to higher group profits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/25156918y2025d000000025
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An experimental investigation of the calculus of consent

M. Scott Niederjohn, Adam Hoffer
1 links
Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

An experimental investigation of the calculus of consent

M. Scott Niederjohn, Adam Hoffer
article en

Abstract

We conduct a laboratory experiment to investigate group decision-making, inspired by a model from Buchanan and Tullock’s The Calculus of Consent . Unlike previous researchers, we move beyond simple majority and unanimity rules, allowing groups to choose voting rules endogenously. The results of our experiment are consistent with the Buchanan–Tullock model. In particular, we confirm a tendency toward less restrictive voting rules when decision-making costs are high and external costs are low. We also find that less restrictive voting rules lead to higher group profits.

Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice
Concordia University Wisconsin (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.