Comparative techno-economic assessment of Fischer Tropsch syncrude production via directly and indirectly electrified biomass gasification routes

• Holistic assessment of electrified biomass-to-FT syncrude production. • Carbon and energy efficiency is increased with electrification. • The levelized cost of syncrude change +33 % to –23 % through electrification. • Combinations of direct and indirect electrification show superior performance. • PBtX route is a superposition of BtX and PtX resulting in superposed performance. To reduce carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, phasing out fossil resources is essential. Renewable alternatives for fuels and chemicals are necessary. Fischer-Tropsch (FT) syncrude is a promising candidate for replacing fossil-based products such as transportation fuels and petrochemicals. This study evaluates syngas production for FT synthesis via gasification of lignocellulosic biomass using a process simulation software to establish mass and energy balances. The process is electrified at various stages using direct electrification (electric heating or co-electrolysis), indirect electrification (water electrolysis or co-electrolysis) and combinations of both types of electrification. The effects of electrification are evaluated in terms of CO 2 emissions, costs, material and energy flows, and key performance indicators. Carbon efficiency increases from 32.6% in the base case to a maximum of 94.5%, while energy efficiency improves from 33.1% to a peak of 50.9% improving efficient biomass utilization. The highest electrification ratio is calculated at 1.36 MW el /MW th . Syncrude production costs range from €2.11/kg (base case) to a minimum of €1.63/kg. The emission factor of syncrude is higher for the electrified scenarios compared to the base case due to the CO 2 intensity of electricity. The results demonstrate that all electrification pathways enhance carbon and energy efficiency. Most pathways show decreased levelized cost of syncrude, highlighting the potential of hybrid Power-Biomass-to-Liquid processes. Notably, combinations of direct and indirect electrification show the best performance. Additionally, methanol (MeOH) and FT syncrude production via the Power-Biomass-to-X route is compared showing the superior performance of MeOH as product.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Thermal Engineering
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.127278
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative techno-economic assessment of Fischer Tropsch syncrude production via directly and indirectly electrified biomass gasification routes

Daniel Klüh, Eemeli Anetjärvi, Marcel Dossow, Esa Vakkilainen et al.
2 citations
Applied Thermal Engineering
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.78
article

Comparative techno-economic assessment of Fischer Tropsch syncrude production via directly and indirectly electrified biomass gasification routes

Daniel Klüh, Eemeli Anetjärvi, Marcel Dossow, Esa Vakkilainen, Kristian Melin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Holistic assessment of electrified biomass-to-FT syncrude production. • Carbon and energy efficiency is increased with electrification. • The levelized cost of syncrude change +33 % to –23 % through electrification. • Combinations of direct and indirect electrification show superior performance. • PBtX route is a superposition of BtX and PtX resulting in superposed performance. To reduce carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, phasing out fossil resources is essential. Renewable alternatives for fuels and chemicals are necessary. Fischer-Tropsch (FT) syncrude is a promising candidate for replacing fossil-based products such as transportation fuels and petrochemicals. This study evaluates syngas production for FT synthesis via gasification of lignocellulosic biomass using a process simulation software to establish mass and energy balances. The process is electrified at various stages using direct electrification (electric heating or co-electrolysis), indirect electrification (water electrolysis or co-electrolysis) and combinations of both types of electrification. The effects of electrification are evaluated in terms of CO 2 emissions, costs, material and energy flows, and key performance indicators. Carbon efficiency increases from 32.6% in the base case to a maximum of 94.5%, while energy efficiency improves from 33.1% to a peak of 50.9% improving efficient biomass utilization. The highest electrification ratio is calculated at 1.36 MW el /MW th . Syncrude production costs range from €2.11/kg (base case) to a minimum of €1.63/kg. The emission factor of syncrude is higher for the electrified scenarios compared to the base case due to the CO 2 intensity of electricity. The results demonstrate that all electrification pathways enhance carbon and energy efficiency. Most pathways show decreased levelized cost of syncrude, highlighting the potential of hybrid Power-Biomass-to-Liquid processes. Notably, combinations of direct and indirect electrification show the best performance. Additionally, methanol (MeOH) and FT syncrude production via the Power-Biomass-to-X route is compared showing the superior performance of MeOH as product.

Applied Thermal EngineeringVol. 278
LAB University of Applied Sciences (FI), Maschinenfabrik Reinhausen (Germany) (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
Business Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.