Exploring train driving automation and signaling interaction

• There are growing efforts to adopt automated trains on urban and conventional lines and the implementation of advanced signaling systems. • Despite advancements in autonomous trains and signaling systems, a notable gap remains in their interaction, especially for higher levels of ATO (GoA3 and GoA4) • The high cost of ETCS implementation has hindered its widespread adoption, necessitating ATO specifications for Class B systems. • Some areas are exempt from PTC installation and rely on legacy signaling, creating challenges for driverless trains and system maintenance. • Collaborative interfacing of trackside components between ATO/DAS and ETCS will enhance overall system functionality The push for better capacity utilization, punctuality, passenger comfort, and energy efficiency has accelerated the adoption of more automated trains. Concurrently, advancements in signaling systems to enhance safety and the European Union's efforts to establish a unified signaling system are becoming more evident. These technologies, although distinct, have the potential to complement each other, with automation handling the operational aspects of train driving while signaling systems oversee signaling functionalities. This study aims to investigate the interaction between train automation and signaling systems. This exploration was motivated by the observation that signaling systems may have been developed based on driver-based approaches; however, more advanced automated systems now require minimal or no human involvement. The study seeks to answer the research questions: How has research on the interaction between train-driving technologies and signaling systems developed over time? And what gaps exist in their interaction? To achieve this, a scoping study was conducted, and 75 peer-reviewed articles were included to explore the interaction of automation and signaling systems. The findings of this study indicate a versatile body of literature and a significant rise in research activity starting around 2015. The study reveals the need for specific operational adaptations to achieve higher levels of automation in advanced signaling environments. Furthermore, the identified research opportunities provide a foundation for future exploration and development in railway technologies overall. The study is done in connection to the Europe’s Rail FutuRe research project (FP6).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Engineering
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2025.100361
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring train driving automation and signaling interaction

Patrick Urassa
Transportation Engineering
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Exploring train driving automation and signaling interaction

Patrick Urassa
article en

Abstract

• There are growing efforts to adopt automated trains on urban and conventional lines and the implementation of advanced signaling systems. • Despite advancements in autonomous trains and signaling systems, a notable gap remains in their interaction, especially for higher levels of ATO (GoA3 and GoA4) • The high cost of ETCS implementation has hindered its widespread adoption, necessitating ATO specifications for Class B systems. • Some areas are exempt from PTC installation and rely on legacy signaling, creating challenges for driverless trains and system maintenance. • Collaborative interfacing of trackside components between ATO/DAS and ETCS will enhance overall system functionality The push for better capacity utilization, punctuality, passenger comfort, and energy efficiency has accelerated the adoption of more automated trains. Concurrently, advancements in signaling systems to enhance safety and the European Union's efforts to establish a unified signaling system are becoming more evident. These technologies, although distinct, have the potential to complement each other, with automation handling the operational aspects of train driving while signaling systems oversee signaling functionalities. This study aims to investigate the interaction between train automation and signaling systems. This exploration was motivated by the observation that signaling systems may have been developed based on driver-based approaches; however, more advanced automated systems now require minimal or no human involvement. The study seeks to answer the research questions: How has research on the interaction between train-driving technologies and signaling systems developed over time? And what gaps exist in their interaction? To achieve this, a scoping study was conducted, and 75 peer-reviewed articles were included to explore the interaction of automation and signaling systems. The findings of this study indicate a versatile body of literature and a significant rise in research activity starting around 2015. The study reveals the need for specific operational adaptations to achieve higher levels of automation in advanced signaling environments. Furthermore, the identified research opportunities provide a foundation for future exploration and development in railway technologies overall. The study is done in connection to the Europe’s Rail FutuRe research project (FP6).

Transportation EngineeringVol. 21
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.