Comparative analysis of classical and ensemble models for predicting whole body vibration induced lumbar spine stress. A case study of agricultural tractor operators

Accurate prediction of lumbar health is necessary for developing effective ergonomic strategies for tractor operators exposed to whole-body vibration. This study aims to predict static compression dose (S ed ), a key measure of lumbar spine stress as per ISO 2631-5, by comparing classical regression and ensemble models. Three tractor operation parameters (average speed, average depth, and pulling force) are considered to assess S ed during rotary tillage operation. The performance of two classical models (Linear and Huber regression) is compared with five ensemble models (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and Bagging regressors) in predicting S ed . The comparison identifies the best models in each category, with linear regression achieving a mean bootstrap R 2 of 0.91 (95 % CI: 0.87 to 0.94) and Random Forest achieving 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.90 to 0.95). To further enhance performance, meta-models are developed using two meta-learners (Random Forest and Gradient Boosting) to integrate classical and ensemble models. These models are optimized using different ensemble strategies: simple averaging, weighted averaging, stacking, and voting regressors. Among these, the stacking method proves most effective, achieving a mean bootstrap R 2 of 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.93 to 0.96). Feature importance analysis reveals that the multi-model combination of ensemble models achieves the highest predictive score (0.99) for S ed . These findings demonstrate that ensemble models outperform classical models in predicting Sed, particularly when combined through stacking methods. This advancement has significant implications for improving occupational health and safety among tractor operators, potentially leading to better ergonomic tractor designs aimed at reducing lumbar spine stress. • Comparing classical models (Linear and Huber Regression) with ensemble models (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and Bagging Regressors) to predict S ed . • Applying advanced meta-modeling strategies to improve prediction performance. • Using Explainable AI techniques, such as feature importance analysis, to better understand operational parameters affecting S ed and to ensure model interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103775
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Effects of Vibration on Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of classical and ensemble models for predicting whole body vibration induced lumbar spine stress. A case study of agricultural tractor operators

Siby Samuel, Yash Kumar, Stephan Milosavljevic, Amandeep Singh et al.
6 citations
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Effects of Vibration on Health
10.33
article

Comparative analysis of classical and ensemble models for predicting whole body vibration induced lumbar spine stress. A case study of agricultural tractor operators

Siby Samuel, Yash Kumar, Stephan Milosavljevic, Amandeep Singh, Philippe Doyon-Poulin, Naser Kh Nawayseh, K.N. Dewangan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Accurate prediction of lumbar health is necessary for developing effective ergonomic strategies for tractor operators exposed to whole-body vibration. This study aims to predict static compression dose (S ed ), a key measure of lumbar spine stress as per ISO 2631-5, by comparing classical regression and ensemble models. Three tractor operation parameters (average speed, average depth, and pulling force) are considered to assess S ed during rotary tillage operation. The performance of two classical models (Linear and Huber regression) is compared with five ensemble models (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and Bagging regressors) in predicting S ed . The comparison identifies the best models in each category, with linear regression achieving a mean bootstrap R 2 of 0.91 (95 % CI: 0.87 to 0.94) and Random Forest achieving 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.90 to 0.95). To further enhance performance, meta-models are developed using two meta-learners (Random Forest and Gradient Boosting) to integrate classical and ensemble models. These models are optimized using different ensemble strategies: simple averaging, weighted averaging, stacking, and voting regressors. Among these, the stacking method proves most effective, achieving a mean bootstrap R 2 of 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.93 to 0.96). Feature importance analysis reveals that the multi-model combination of ensemble models achieves the highest predictive score (0.99) for S ed . These findings demonstrate that ensemble models outperform classical models in predicting Sed, particularly when combined through stacking methods. This advancement has significant implications for improving occupational health and safety among tractor operators, potentially leading to better ergonomic tractor designs aimed at reducing lumbar spine stress. • Comparing classical models (Linear and Huber Regression) with ensemble models (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and Bagging Regressors) to predict S ed . • Applying advanced meta-modeling strategies to improve prediction performance. • Using Explainable AI techniques, such as feature importance analysis, to better understand operational parameters affecting S ed and to ensure model interpretation.

International Journal of Industrial ErgonomicsVol. 108
University of Iowa (US), University of Waterloo (CA), North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology (IN), University of Sharjah (AE), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Effects of Vibration on Health
10.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.