Assessing extensive pasture-based beef production in South Africa under future climate change conditions

Assessing the impact of climate change on extensive pasture-based beef production across varied agro-ecological regions is crucial for designing customized adaptation measures. This study assesses the effects of climate change on extensive pasture-based beef production systems in three South African agro-ecological regions (Bloemfontein, Phalaborwa and Buffalo Berlin) under two climate change scenarios, namely the representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5. The LiGAPS-Beef model, previously calibrated for the region, was used to evaluate the impact of climate change on beef cattle production under pasture-based extensive systems. Four breed types, namely Bos taurus , Composite, Zebu indicine and Sanga cattle were included in this study. Genetic parameters for each breed were obtained from SA Stud Book, Livestock Registering Federation (LRF) and literature. Measured historical weather data was obtained from the South African Weather Service for the three agro-ecological regions. An ensemble of eight regional climate model (RCA4) simulations from the CORDEX Africa initiative was used to generate future climate change projection data for the period 2036–2065 under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. The future nutritional composition data for forage was collected from studies that simulated and predicted future forage quality under climate change conditions. The study found that the baseline average daily gain (ADG) was significantly higher (0.40 kg/head/day) than the simulated RCP 4.5 (0.21 kg/head/day, −48 %) and RCP 8.5 (0.20 kg/head/day, −51 %) ADGs regardless of breed type when both feed quality and feed quantity limited growth. Although the effect of the climate change scenarios on beef production was agro-ecological region dependent, the performance of Bos taurus declined more than other breeds under future climate scenarios while the Sanga and the Composite types were the most resilient, especially in hot climate areas. Model simulations predict that future climate change will have a greater negative impact on cattle in Buffalo Berlin and Phalaborwa, while those in Bloemfontein will be least affected. The study also highlights that under future climate change scenarios, pasture quality will be the key factor influencing cattle growth in Bloemfontein and Buffalo Berlin, while pasture quantity will be the dominant factor in Phalaborwa if stocking rates remain unchanged. The study highlights the need for nutritional and pasture management interventions for pasture-based extensive system (e.g., feed supplementation, adjusting the stocking rate to match pasture availability, identifying and integrating drought and/or heat tolerant ecotypes, fodder trees that provide shade for the animals) to mitigate the expected decline in beef cattle performance in South African agro-ecological regions. Quantifying the impact of anticipated climate change on pasture-based extensive beef production and identifying specific factors that limit beef production per breed type in the different agro-ecological regions is crucial for assessing the potential ramifications on beef production. This information empowers farmers and policy makers to develop targeted mitigation and adaptation strategies that promote resilience of the beef production system in the respective regions. • Quantifying climate change impact on beef production is vital for coping measures. • Beef cattle growth was simulated under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 in South Africa. • 2050 simulated growth declined by 48 % in RCP 4.5 and 51 % in RCP 8.5 from baseline. • Growth of Bos taurus was most adversely affected, but Sanga was the most resilient. • Location-specific intervention is vital to sustain beef production in South Africa.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Systems
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104431
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing extensive pasture-based beef production in South Africa under future climate change conditions

Eyob Habte Tesfamariam, S.J. Oosting, A. van der Linden, Christopher Magona et al.
2 citations
Agricultural Systems
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
2.39
article

Assessing extensive pasture-based beef production in South Africa under future climate change conditions

Eyob Habte Tesfamariam, S.J. Oosting, A. van der Linden, Christopher Magona, Carina Visser, Michael Mengistu, Abubeker Hassen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Assessing the impact of climate change on extensive pasture-based beef production across varied agro-ecological regions is crucial for designing customized adaptation measures. This study assesses the effects of climate change on extensive pasture-based beef production systems in three South African agro-ecological regions (Bloemfontein, Phalaborwa and Buffalo Berlin) under two climate change scenarios, namely the representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5. The LiGAPS-Beef model, previously calibrated for the region, was used to evaluate the impact of climate change on beef cattle production under pasture-based extensive systems. Four breed types, namely Bos taurus , Composite, Zebu indicine and Sanga cattle were included in this study. Genetic parameters for each breed were obtained from SA Stud Book, Livestock Registering Federation (LRF) and literature. Measured historical weather data was obtained from the South African Weather Service for the three agro-ecological regions. An ensemble of eight regional climate model (RCA4) simulations from the CORDEX Africa initiative was used to generate future climate change projection data for the period 2036–2065 under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. The future nutritional composition data for forage was collected from studies that simulated and predicted future forage quality under climate change conditions. The study found that the baseline average daily gain (ADG) was significantly higher (0.40 kg/head/day) than the simulated RCP 4.5 (0.21 kg/head/day, −48 %) and RCP 8.5 (0.20 kg/head/day, −51 %) ADGs regardless of breed type when both feed quality and feed quantity limited growth. Although the effect of the climate change scenarios on beef production was agro-ecological region dependent, the performance of Bos taurus declined more than other breeds under future climate scenarios while the Sanga and the Composite types were the most resilient, especially in hot climate areas. Model simulations predict that future climate change will have a greater negative impact on cattle in Buffalo Berlin and Phalaborwa, while those in Bloemfontein will be least affected. The study also highlights that under future climate change scenarios, pasture quality will be the key factor influencing cattle growth in Bloemfontein and Buffalo Berlin, while pasture quantity will be the dominant factor in Phalaborwa if stocking rates remain unchanged. The study highlights the need for nutritional and pasture management interventions for pasture-based extensive system (e.g., feed supplementation, adjusting the stocking rate to match pasture availability, identifying and integrating drought and/or heat tolerant ecotypes, fodder trees that provide shade for the animals) to mitigate the expected decline in beef cattle performance in South African agro-ecological regions. Quantifying the impact of anticipated climate change on pasture-based extensive beef production and identifying specific factors that limit beef production per breed type in the different agro-ecological regions is crucial for assessing the potential ramifications on beef production. This information empowers farmers and policy makers to develop targeted mitigation and adaptation strategies that promote resilience of the beef production system in the respective regions. • Quantifying climate change impact on beef production is vital for coping measures. • Beef cattle growth was simulated under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 in South Africa. • 2050 simulated growth declined by 48 % in RCP 4.5 and 51 % in RCP 8.5 from baseline. • Growth of Bos taurus was most adversely affected, but Sanga was the most resilient. • Location-specific intervention is vital to sustain beef production in South Africa.

Agricultural SystemsVol. 229
Red Meat Research and Development South Africa
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
2.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.