Addressing the gaps in understanding and assessing energy communities

Since their explicit mention in the recast of the European Renewable Energy Directive (Directive 2018/2001) and the Internal Electricity Market Directive (Directive 2019/944), energy communities in Europe are gaining increased attention. Nevertheless, despite the increasing literature coverage, their true functioning and needs as well as more technical elements such as their meticulous mapping and an all-encompassing definition of their performance are aspects that still need to be studied, highlighting the complexity of assessing them comprehensively. In this paper, we discuss the various elements that are needed for a proper understanding of energy communities as ever increasingly multifaceted energy actors and try to touch upon various contextual parameters in order to end up with a better understanding of their complexity. In particular, we discuss the need to review the historical and socio-cultural context in which energy communities emerge, the assumed benefits (e.g. inclusion, energy democracy and energy justice) and whether they are justified in practice, as well as the need to thoroughly map them. We conclude with recommendations on how to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of energy communities. • Various elements for a sound understanding of energy communities are reviewed. • The complexity of energy communities is discussed. • Recommendations for a better understanding of energy communities are given.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104176
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the gaps in understanding and assessing energy communities

Laura López de Frutos, Leen Peeters, Christos Trompoukis
4 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
16.81
article

Addressing the gaps in understanding and assessing energy communities

Laura López de Frutos, Leen Peeters, Christos Trompoukis
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Since their explicit mention in the recast of the European Renewable Energy Directive (Directive 2018/2001) and the Internal Electricity Market Directive (Directive 2019/944), energy communities in Europe are gaining increased attention. Nevertheless, despite the increasing literature coverage, their true functioning and needs as well as more technical elements such as their meticulous mapping and an all-encompassing definition of their performance are aspects that still need to be studied, highlighting the complexity of assessing them comprehensively. In this paper, we discuss the various elements that are needed for a proper understanding of energy communities as ever increasingly multifaceted energy actors and try to touch upon various contextual parameters in order to end up with a better understanding of their complexity. In particular, we discuss the need to review the historical and socio-cultural context in which energy communities emerge, the assumed benefits (e.g. inclusion, energy democracy and energy justice) and whether they are justified in practice, as well as the need to thoroughly map them. We conclude with recommendations on how to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of energy communities. • Various elements for a sound understanding of energy communities are reviewed. • The complexity of energy communities is discussed. • Recommendations for a better understanding of energy communities are given.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 127
ProDigest (Belgium) (BE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.