Tackling transformational change in climate policy appraisal: experiences and perceptions of United Kingdom policy analysts

Progress in implementing climate policy in the United Kingdom consistent with the country's target to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 has been modest. This is despite the well-established physical risks of climate change, the UK's broadly accepted intention to act decisively, and the international recognition of the need for transformational climate action. Previous research suggests that the practical and theoretical limitations of existing decision-making frameworks and the accompanying economic tools may hinder transforming objectives into action. We explore how practitioners perceive the current assessment of transformational climate policies in the UK, drawing on interviews with government analysts from multiple departments. We identify various challenges including a status-quo bias and inadequate treatment of innovation and uncertainty that the recommended decision-making framework creates when applied to transformational climate policy proposals. Practitioners believed that new decision-making frameworks are needed to improve the assessment of transformational policies. These frameworks should support evidence-based decision-making in areas of deep uncertainty to enable government to avoid pessimism and status-quo biases. Frameworks should also find the balance between a detailed representation of transformational change and communicability to decision-makers to be effective. More economic modelling tools that view the economy as a dynamic system are also needed to provide decision-makers with more robust evidence on transformational change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104190
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tackling transformational change in climate policy appraisal: experiences and perceptions of United Kingdom policy analysts

Pablo Salas, Femke J. M. M. Nijsse, Roberto Pasqualino, Jean-François Mercure et al.
Energy Research & Social Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Tackling transformational change in climate policy appraisal: experiences and perceptions of United Kingdom policy analysts

Pablo Salas, Femke J. M. M. Nijsse, Roberto Pasqualino, Jean-François Mercure, Cormac Lynch, Pete Barbrook-Johnson, Jin Qin
article en

Abstract

Progress in implementing climate policy in the United Kingdom consistent with the country's target to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 has been modest. This is despite the well-established physical risks of climate change, the UK's broadly accepted intention to act decisively, and the international recognition of the need for transformational climate action. Previous research suggests that the practical and theoretical limitations of existing decision-making frameworks and the accompanying economic tools may hinder transforming objectives into action. We explore how practitioners perceive the current assessment of transformational climate policies in the UK, drawing on interviews with government analysts from multiple departments. We identify various challenges including a status-quo bias and inadequate treatment of innovation and uncertainty that the recommended decision-making framework creates when applied to transformational climate policy proposals. Practitioners believed that new decision-making frameworks are needed to improve the assessment of transformational policies. These frameworks should support evidence-based decision-making in areas of deep uncertainty to enable government to avoid pessimism and status-quo biases. Frameworks should also find the balance between a detailed representation of transformational change and communicability to decision-makers to be effective. More economic modelling tools that view the economy as a dynamic system are also needed to provide decision-makers with more robust evidence on transformational change.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 127
University of Exeter (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Centre for Natural Resource Governance (ZW), New College (GB), World Bank Group (US)
Children's Investment Fund Foundation, Government of the United Kingdom
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.