IDA-based fragility curves for helical pile-supported bridges in cohesive soil

Fragility curves were developed for a three-span bridge structure supported by helical piles in homogeneous cohesive soil. To address uncertainties in material properties, Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) was used, while Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) was employed to construct the seismic demand model. Fifteen bridge samples were subjected to 22 ground motion records, each scaled to 20 intensity levels, resulting in a total of 6600 three-dimensional nonlinear time history analyses. The resulting probabilistic seismic demand model estimated expected damage across a range of seismic intensities, using key engineering demand parameters, pier drift, pile ductility factor, and settlement ratio, to evaluate damage states from slight to complete. Regression results showed that total span length, rebar yield strength, and damping ratio significantly influence pier drift, with longer spans increasing drift while higher rebar strength and damping ratios decrease it. Furthermore, the ductility factor of piles is affected by damping ratio, the number of piles, and foundation area, while damping and pile spacing significantly impact the settlement ratio. Overall, the analysis indicated that helical piles are more vulnerable in terms of ductility than settlement, making them the most critical component in the bridge–soil–foundation system. • Developed fragility curves for a three-span bridge supported by helical piles in cohesive soil. •Conducted 6600 three-dimensional nonlinear time history analyses using Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) and OpenSees, including soil modeling to move beyond spring-like simplifications commonly used in fragility studies. •Observed that longer spans increase pier drift, while higher rebar yield strength and damping ratios reduce it; and found that settlement ratio decreases with higher damping ratios and increased pile spacing. •Identified damping ratio, number of piles, and foundation area as key factors affecting pile ductility factor; highlighted the greater vulnerability of helical piles in ductility compared to settlement under seismic loading. •Determined that piles are the most vulnerable component within the bridge–soil–foundation system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109618
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IDA-based fragility curves for helical pile-supported bridges in cohesive soil

M. Hesham El Naggar, Burak Ozturk, A. Fouad Hussein
6 citations
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
5.72
article

IDA-based fragility curves for helical pile-supported bridges in cohesive soil

M. Hesham El Naggar, Burak Ozturk, A. Fouad Hussein
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Fragility curves were developed for a three-span bridge structure supported by helical piles in homogeneous cohesive soil. To address uncertainties in material properties, Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) was used, while Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) was employed to construct the seismic demand model. Fifteen bridge samples were subjected to 22 ground motion records, each scaled to 20 intensity levels, resulting in a total of 6600 three-dimensional nonlinear time history analyses. The resulting probabilistic seismic demand model estimated expected damage across a range of seismic intensities, using key engineering demand parameters, pier drift, pile ductility factor, and settlement ratio, to evaluate damage states from slight to complete. Regression results showed that total span length, rebar yield strength, and damping ratio significantly influence pier drift, with longer spans increasing drift while higher rebar strength and damping ratios decrease it. Furthermore, the ductility factor of piles is affected by damping ratio, the number of piles, and foundation area, while damping and pile spacing significantly impact the settlement ratio. Overall, the analysis indicated that helical piles are more vulnerable in terms of ductility than settlement, making them the most critical component in the bridge–soil–foundation system. • Developed fragility curves for a three-span bridge supported by helical piles in cohesive soil. •Conducted 6600 three-dimensional nonlinear time history analyses using Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) and OpenSees, including soil modeling to move beyond spring-like simplifications commonly used in fragility studies. •Observed that longer spans increase pier drift, while higher rebar yield strength and damping ratios reduce it; and found that settlement ratio decreases with higher damping ratios and increased pile spacing. •Identified damping ratio, number of piles, and foundation area as key factors affecting pile ductility factor; highlighted the greater vulnerability of helical piles in ductility compared to settlement under seismic loading. •Determined that piles are the most vulnerable component within the bridge–soil–foundation system.

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringVol. 198
Western University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.