An Earth-System-Oriented View of the S2S Predictability of North American Weather Regimes

Abstract It is widely agreed that subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictability arises from the atmospheric initial state during early lead times and from the land and ocean during long lead times. We test this hypothesis for the large-scale midlatitude atmosphere by training numerous extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models to predict weather regimes (WRs) over North America at 1–8-week lead times. Each model uses a different predictor from one Earth system component (atmosphere, ocean, or land) sourced from reanalysis. According to the models, the atmosphere provides more predictability during the first two forecast weeks, and the three components performed similarly afterward. However, the skill and sources of predictability are highly dependent on the season and target WR. Our results show greater WR predictability in fall and winter, particularly for the Pacific trough and Pacific ridge regimes, driven primarily by the ocean (e.g., El Niño–Southern Oscillation and sea ice). For the Pacific ridge in winter, the stratosphere also contributes significantly to predictability across most S2S lead times. Additionally, the initial large-scale tropospheric structure (encompassing the tropics and extratropics, e.g., Madden–Julian oscillation) and soil conditions play a relevant role—most notably for the Greenland high regime in winter. This study highlights the previously identified sources of predictability for the large-scale atmosphere and gives insight into new sources for future study. Given how closely linked WRs are to surface precipitation and temperature anomalies, storm tracks, and extreme events, the study results contribute to improving the S2S prediction of surface weather. Significance Statement Recurrent and persistent large-scale atmospheric patterns are referred to as weather regimes. Algorithms can be trained to predict weather regimes over North America up to 8 weeks into the future. Contributions to prediction skill can originate from different parts of the Earth system, such as stratospheric wind anomalies, subsurface ocean heat content, and soil water content. In this study, we found that contributions to the predictability of weather regimes can vary in importance depending on the lead time, season, and predicted weather regime. These results show that predictability contributions can vary more than previously documented and deepen our understanding of sources of predictability, which can help improve forecasts extending beyond 2 weeks for the benefit of society and decision-makers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/aies-d-24-0075.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Earth-System-Oriented View of the S2S Predictability of North American Weather Regimes

María J. Molina, Jhayron S. Pérez‐Carrasquilla
1 citations
Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems
Climate variability and models
1.11
article

An Earth-System-Oriented View of the S2S Predictability of North American Weather Regimes

María J. Molina, Jhayron S. Pérez‐Carrasquilla
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract It is widely agreed that subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictability arises from the atmospheric initial state during early lead times and from the land and ocean during long lead times. We test this hypothesis for the large-scale midlatitude atmosphere by training numerous extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models to predict weather regimes (WRs) over North America at 1–8-week lead times. Each model uses a different predictor from one Earth system component (atmosphere, ocean, or land) sourced from reanalysis. According to the models, the atmosphere provides more predictability during the first two forecast weeks, and the three components performed similarly afterward. However, the skill and sources of predictability are highly dependent on the season and target WR. Our results show greater WR predictability in fall and winter, particularly for the Pacific trough and Pacific ridge regimes, driven primarily by the ocean (e.g., El Niño–Southern Oscillation and sea ice). For the Pacific ridge in winter, the stratosphere also contributes significantly to predictability across most S2S lead times. Additionally, the initial large-scale tropospheric structure (encompassing the tropics and extratropics, e.g., Madden–Julian oscillation) and soil conditions play a relevant role—most notably for the Greenland high regime in winter. This study highlights the previously identified sources of predictability for the large-scale atmosphere and gives insight into new sources for future study. Given how closely linked WRs are to surface precipitation and temperature anomalies, storm tracks, and extreme events, the study results contribute to improving the S2S prediction of surface weather. Significance Statement Recurrent and persistent large-scale atmospheric patterns are referred to as weather regimes. Algorithms can be trained to predict weather regimes over North America up to 8 weeks into the future. Contributions to prediction skill can originate from different parts of the Earth system, such as stratospheric wind anomalies, subsurface ocean heat content, and soil water content. In this study, we found that contributions to the predictability of weather regimes can vary in importance depending on the lead time, season, and predicted weather regime. These results show that predictability contributions can vary more than previously documented and deepen our understanding of sources of predictability, which can help improve forecasts extending beyond 2 weeks for the benefit of society and decision-makers.

Artificial Intelligence for the Earth SystemsVol. 4(3)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Climate variability and models
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.