Comparison of Rectal and Gastrointestinal Core Temperatures During Heat Tolerance Testing

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Military capability may be reduced in hot environments with individuals at risk of exertional heat stroke (EHS). Heat tolerance testing (HTT) can be used to indicate readiness to return to duty following EHS. HTT traditionally relies on rectal core temperature (T<sub>re</sub>) assessment via a rectal probe. This study investigated the use of gastrointestinal core temperature (T<sub>gi</sub>) as an alternative to T<sub>re</sub> during HTT. A secondary aim was to compare physiological factors between heat-tolerant and heat-intolerant trials. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Australian Defence Force personnel undergoing HTT following known or suspected heat stroke volunteered (<i>n</i> = 23 cases participating in 26 trials) along with 14 controls with no known heat illness history. Confusion matrices enabled comparison of HTT outcome based on T<sub>gi</sub> and T<sub>re</sub>. The validity of T<sub>gi</sub> compared to T<sub>re</sub> during HTT was assessed using correlation and bias. Comparisons between heat-tolerant and intolerant trials were performed using non-parametric tests. <i>Results</i>: Although T<sub>gi</sub> correlated closely with T<sub>re</sub> (Spearman's rank correlation ρ = 0.893; median bias 0.2 °C) there was no consistent pattern in the differences between measures. Importantly, the two measures only agreed on heat tolerance outcome in 80% of trials with T<sub>gi</sub> failing to detect heat intolerance identified by T<sub>re</sub> in 6 of 8 trials. If T<sub>gi</sub> was relied upon for diagnostic outcome, return to duty may occur before full recovery. None of the assessed covariates were related to the difference between T<sub>re</sub> and T<sub>gi</sub>. In addition, resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure were significantly lower and body surface area to mass ratio significantly higher in heat-tolerant compared to intolerant trials. <i>Conclusions</i>: It is not recommended to rely on T<sub>gi</sub> instead of T<sub>re</sub> during HTT. Resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure findings point to the importance of aerobic exercise in conveying heat tolerance along with body composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061111
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Rectal and Gastrointestinal Core Temperatures During Heat Tolerance Testing

Michael T. Meehan, Rhondda Jones, Melissa Crowe
2 citations
Medicina
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
2.33
article

Comparison of Rectal and Gastrointestinal Core Temperatures During Heat Tolerance Testing

Michael T. Meehan, Rhondda Jones, Melissa Crowe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Military capability may be reduced in hot environments with individuals at risk of exertional heat stroke (EHS). Heat tolerance testing (HTT) can be used to indicate readiness to return to duty following EHS. HTT traditionally relies on rectal core temperature (T<sub>re</sub>) assessment via a rectal probe. This study investigated the use of gastrointestinal core temperature (T<sub>gi</sub>) as an alternative to T<sub>re</sub> during HTT. A secondary aim was to compare physiological factors between heat-tolerant and heat-intolerant trials. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Australian Defence Force personnel undergoing HTT following known or suspected heat stroke volunteered (<i>n</i> = 23 cases participating in 26 trials) along with 14 controls with no known heat illness history. Confusion matrices enabled comparison of HTT outcome based on T<sub>gi</sub> and T<sub>re</sub>. The validity of T<sub>gi</sub> compared to T<sub>re</sub> during HTT was assessed using correlation and bias. Comparisons between heat-tolerant and intolerant trials were performed using non-parametric tests. <i>Results</i>: Although T<sub>gi</sub> correlated closely with T<sub>re</sub> (Spearman's rank correlation ρ = 0.893; median bias 0.2 °C) there was no consistent pattern in the differences between measures. Importantly, the two measures only agreed on heat tolerance outcome in 80% of trials with T<sub>gi</sub> failing to detect heat intolerance identified by T<sub>re</sub> in 6 of 8 trials. If T<sub>gi</sub> was relied upon for diagnostic outcome, return to duty may occur before full recovery. None of the assessed covariates were related to the difference between T<sub>re</sub> and T<sub>gi</sub>. In addition, resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure were significantly lower and body surface area to mass ratio significantly higher in heat-tolerant compared to intolerant trials. <i>Conclusions</i>: It is not recommended to rely on T<sub>gi</sub> instead of T<sub>re</sub> during HTT. Resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure findings point to the importance of aerobic exercise in conveying heat tolerance along with body composition.

MedicinaVol. 61(6)
Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.