Estimating and presenting non-linear associations with restricted cubic splines

Most of the regression models commonly used in epidemiology-including logistic regression and methods for time-to-event outcomes such as Cox regression-define the relationship between a set of covariates and the outcome of interest using linear functions, thus making implicit assumptions of linearity for continuous covariates. Categorizing continuous covariates, which represents a common option to address non-linearities, introduces additional assumptions and has recognized limitations in terms of results interpretation. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) offer a flexible alternative tool that can improve the model fit in the presence of non-linear associations, overcoming many of the limitations of categorical approaches and providing information on the shape of the exposure-outcome relationship. Including RCS transformations in regression models, however, is not straightforward analytically and presents challenges in terms of interpretation and graphical presentation of the exposure-outcome association. In this paper, we provide an introduction to the application of RCS in regression modeling for assessing non-linear exposure-outcome associations in epidemiological studies. We present RCS as a flexible extension of categorization and describe the two key steps of integrating RCS in regression: model fitting and graphical presentation. We detail key considerations that can guide the choice of RCS transformations, the interpretation of regression output, and the translation of regression results into graphical displays of the exposure-outcome association. To accompany this presentation, we also provide a set of functions and examples in R, Stata, and SAS, thereby providing a comprehensive set of tools for flexibly and robustly incorporating continuous covariates into regression modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaf088
Citations
28
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
37.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating and presenting non-linear associations with restricted cubic splines

Jeong‐Gun Park, Giorgio Melloni, Andrea Bellavia, Michael G. Palazzolo et al.
28 citations
International Journal of Epidemiology
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
37.37
article

Estimating and presenting non-linear associations with restricted cubic splines

Jeong‐Gun Park, Giorgio Melloni, Andrea Bellavia, Michael G. Palazzolo, Sabina A. Murphy, Andrea Discacciati
article en
28 citations

Abstract

Most of the regression models commonly used in epidemiology-including logistic regression and methods for time-to-event outcomes such as Cox regression-define the relationship between a set of covariates and the outcome of interest using linear functions, thus making implicit assumptions of linearity for continuous covariates. Categorizing continuous covariates, which represents a common option to address non-linearities, introduces additional assumptions and has recognized limitations in terms of results interpretation. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) offer a flexible alternative tool that can improve the model fit in the presence of non-linear associations, overcoming many of the limitations of categorical approaches and providing information on the shape of the exposure-outcome relationship. Including RCS transformations in regression models, however, is not straightforward analytically and presents challenges in terms of interpretation and graphical presentation of the exposure-outcome association. In this paper, we provide an introduction to the application of RCS in regression modeling for assessing non-linear exposure-outcome associations in epidemiological studies. We present RCS as a flexible extension of categorization and describe the two key steps of integrating RCS in regression: model fitting and graphical presentation. We detail key considerations that can guide the choice of RCS transformations, the interpretation of regression output, and the translation of regression results into graphical displays of the exposure-outcome association. To accompany this presentation, we also provide a set of functions and examples in R, Stata, and SAS, thereby providing a comprehensive set of tools for flexibly and robustly incorporating continuous covariates into regression modeling.

International Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 54(4)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
37.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.