A Replication and Extension of Three Studies Investigating Escalation of Commitment and Regret Aversion

This article presents preregistered replications of three influential studies in the field of escalation of commitment and regret aversion. In Study 1, we found partial support for Staw's (1976) article on the effects of personal responsibility and consequences on the escalation of commitment. Study 2 failed to replicate Zeelenberg et al. (1996) article examining the role of feedback on risk preferences. The extension of study 2 found a small correlation between the tendency to experience regret and risk preferences of participants in the Safe ONLY condition. In Study 3, we failed to replicate Wong and Kwong's (2007) results that showed a causal effect of personal responsibility and regret possibility on the escalation of commitment. Moreover, study 3's extension found no support for individual differences in neuroticism on the escalation of commitment. The impact of this replication on our understanding of decision-making processes and the factors that contribute to individuals' commitment to their choices will be discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251345021
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Replication and Extension of Three Studies Investigating Escalation of Commitment and Regret Aversion

Ignazio Ziano, Boley Cheng, Young Lo, Kam Hoi Ching et al.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

A Replication and Extension of Three Studies Investigating Escalation of Commitment and Regret Aversion

Ignazio Ziano, Boley Cheng, Young Lo, Kam Hoi Ching, Man Yip, Bill Shi, Nandita Dhanda, Angela Kwun Lan Phuong
article en

Abstract

This article presents preregistered replications of three influential studies in the field of escalation of commitment and regret aversion. In Study 1, we found partial support for Staw's (1976) article on the effects of personal responsibility and consequences on the escalation of commitment. Study 2 failed to replicate Zeelenberg et al. (1996) article examining the role of feedback on risk preferences. The extension of study 2 found a small correlation between the tendency to experience regret and risk preferences of participants in the Safe ONLY condition. In Study 3, we failed to replicate Wong and Kwong's (2007) results that showed a causal effect of personal responsibility and regret possibility on the escalation of commitment. Moreover, study 3's extension found no support for individual differences in neuroticism on the escalation of commitment. The impact of this replication on our understanding of decision-making processes and the factors that contribute to individuals' commitment to their choices will be discussed.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of Geneva (CH), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Replication and Extension of Three Studies Investigating Escalation of Commitment and Regret Aversion — Ignazio Ziano, Boley Cheng, et al. · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS