The Characterization of Polymers That Mimic the Aortic Wall’s Mechanical Properties and Their Suitability for Use in the 3D Printing of Aortic Phantoms

(1) While three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is increasingly being used for the fabrication of high-fidelity, patient-specific aortic models, data on the mechanical properties of polymers are sparse. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify suitable polymers for this purpose. (2) Methods: Eight flexible polymers, with Shore A hardnesses (ShA) of 27-85, were tested to determine their suitability for PolyJet printing technology. They were tested against porcine aortic and bovine pericardial tissue for suture retention strength, uniaxial stress testing according to ISO 37, and burst pressure in a standardized test setting. (3) Results: The polymers with a ShA of 30-50 showed statistically non-inferior suture retention strength, tensile strength, and burst pressure resistance when compared to pericardial and aortic tissue, respectively. (4) Conclusions: This was the first report to analyze the mechanical properties of eight different flexible PolyJet polymers. We found that the polymers with a Shore A hardness of 30-50 most closely mimicked the mechanical properties of aortic tissue. Therefore, they can be recommended for the additive manufacturing (3D printing) of aortic phantoms for simulation and training purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17121700
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Characterization of Polymers That Mimic the Aortic Wall’s Mechanical Properties and Their Suitability for Use in the 3D Printing of Aortic Phantoms

Oroa Salem, Moritz Wegner, David Wippel, Bernhard Dorweiler et al.
2 citations
Polymers
Anatomy and Medical Technology
1.35
article

The Characterization of Polymers That Mimic the Aortic Wall’s Mechanical Properties and Their Suitability for Use in the 3D Printing of Aortic Phantoms

Oroa Salem, Moritz Wegner, David Wippel, Bernhard Dorweiler, Anja Niehoff, Florian Enzmann, Benan Sahin Karagoez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

(1) While three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is increasingly being used for the fabrication of high-fidelity, patient-specific aortic models, data on the mechanical properties of polymers are sparse. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify suitable polymers for this purpose. (2) Methods: Eight flexible polymers, with Shore A hardnesses (ShA) of 27-85, were tested to determine their suitability for PolyJet printing technology. They were tested against porcine aortic and bovine pericardial tissue for suture retention strength, uniaxial stress testing according to ISO 37, and burst pressure in a standardized test setting. (3) Results: The polymers with a ShA of 30-50 showed statistically non-inferior suture retention strength, tensile strength, and burst pressure resistance when compared to pericardial and aortic tissue, respectively. (4) Conclusions: This was the first report to analyze the mechanical properties of eight different flexible PolyJet polymers. We found that the polymers with a Shore A hardness of 30-50 most closely mimicked the mechanical properties of aortic tissue. Therefore, they can be recommended for the additive manufacturing (3D printing) of aortic phantoms for simulation and training purposes.

PolymersVol. 17(12)
German Sport University Cologne (DE), Innsbruck Medical University (AT), University of Cologne (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität zu Köln
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.