Mixture credibility formulas

Abstract The classical credibility premium provides a simple and efficient method for predicting future damages and losses. However, when dealing with a nonhomogeneous population, this widely used technique has been challenged by the Regression Tree Credibility (RTC) model and the Logistic Regression Credibility (LRC) model. This article introduces the Mixture Credibility Formula (MCF), which represents a convex combination of the classical credibility premiums of several homogeneous subpopulations derived from the original population. We also compare the performance of the MCF method with the RTC and LRC methods. Our analysis demonstrates that the MCF method consistently outperforms these approaches in terms of the quadratic loss function, highlighting its effectiveness in refining insurance premium calculations and enhancing risk assessment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Actuarial Science
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525000065
Primary Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixture credibility formulas

Amir T. Payandeh Najafabadi, Mustafa Abed
Annals of Actuarial Science
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
article

Mixture credibility formulas

Amir T. Payandeh Najafabadi, Mustafa Abed
article en

Abstract

Abstract The classical credibility premium provides a simple and efficient method for predicting future damages and losses. However, when dealing with a nonhomogeneous population, this widely used technique has been challenged by the Regression Tree Credibility (RTC) model and the Logistic Regression Credibility (LRC) model. This article introduces the Mixture Credibility Formula (MCF), which represents a convex combination of the classical credibility premiums of several homogeneous subpopulations derived from the original population. We also compare the performance of the MCF method with the RTC and LRC methods. Our analysis demonstrates that the MCF method consistently outperforms these approaches in terms of the quadratic loss function, highlighting its effectiveness in refining insurance premium calculations and enhancing risk assessment strategies.

Annals of Actuarial ScienceVol. 20(1)
Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.