Liver Transplantation for Colorectal Metastases: Impact of a Standardised Protocol for Patient Selection on Transplant Outcomes

<b>Background:</b> Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) occur in up to 50% of colorectal cancer with a significant impact on patient survival, of whom only 20-30% will be considered suitable for surgical treatment. Despite the progress in systemic therapies, palliative chemotherapy alone results in a 5-year overall survival (OS) < 10%. Recently, liver transplantation (LT) has been reconsidered as an option and demonstrates improved survival in highly selected patients. This study assessed the impact of implementing a standardised patient selection protocol (LITORALE) on post-transplant outcomes for unresectable CRLM (uCRLM) at a high-volume single centre. Methods: This is a prospective observational study including all consecutive patients transplanted for uCRLM at our institution between July 2015 and September 2024. This prospective observational study evaluated the impact of the LITORALE protocol on post-transplant outcomes in uCRLM patients at a single centre. Patients who underwent LT between July 2015 and September 2024 were grouped into pre-LITORALE (2015-2021) and LITORALE (post-2021) cohorts. Recipient profiles, transplant variables, and post-transplant outcomes were compared. <b>Results</b>: Twenty-one patients were included (eight pre-LITORALE, thirteen LITORALE). The LITORALE group had a lower median number of lesions (4 vs. 17.5, <i>p</i> = 0.004), a smaller major lesion size (3 cm vs. 5.5 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.082), and a significantly lower tumour burden score (6.32 vs. 18.02, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Similar to recent major clinical trials, one- and three-years OS were 100% and 83%, respectively, after protocol introduction; recurrence patterns were significantly different, with reduced multi-site recurrences (7.7% vs. 50%, <i>p</i> = 0.048) and a higher incidence of lung-only recurrences in the LITORALE group (50% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.033). <b>Conclusions</b>: The introduction of the LITORALE protocol significantly influenced patient selection and recurrence patterns in LT for uCRLM. Although the limited number of patients and the short study timespan highlight the need for future validation, these preliminary results support the adoption of structured, multidisciplinary criteria to optimise oncologic outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122046
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liver Transplantation for Colorectal Metastases: Impact of a Standardised Protocol for Patient Selection on Transplant Outcomes

Maria Cristina Morelli, Guido Fallani, Enrico Prosperi, Matteo Cescon et al.
2 citations
Cancers
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
4.01
article

Liver Transplantation for Colorectal Metastases: Impact of a Standardised Protocol for Patient Selection on Transplant Outcomes

Maria Cristina Morelli, Guido Fallani, Enrico Prosperi, Matteo Cescon, Andrea Laurenzi, Chiara Bonatti, Matthew Prior, Antonio Daniele Pinna, Alberto Stocco, Chiara Zanfi, Matteo Serenari, Federica Mirici Cappa, Matteo Ravaioli, Giorgia Radi, Federica Odaldi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) occur in up to 50% of colorectal cancer with a significant impact on patient survival, of whom only 20-30% will be considered suitable for surgical treatment. Despite the progress in systemic therapies, palliative chemotherapy alone results in a 5-year overall survival (OS) < 10%. Recently, liver transplantation (LT) has been reconsidered as an option and demonstrates improved survival in highly selected patients. This study assessed the impact of implementing a standardised patient selection protocol (LITORALE) on post-transplant outcomes for unresectable CRLM (uCRLM) at a high-volume single centre. Methods: This is a prospective observational study including all consecutive patients transplanted for uCRLM at our institution between July 2015 and September 2024. This prospective observational study evaluated the impact of the LITORALE protocol on post-transplant outcomes in uCRLM patients at a single centre. Patients who underwent LT between July 2015 and September 2024 were grouped into pre-LITORALE (2015-2021) and LITORALE (post-2021) cohorts. Recipient profiles, transplant variables, and post-transplant outcomes were compared. <b>Results</b>: Twenty-one patients were included (eight pre-LITORALE, thirteen LITORALE). The LITORALE group had a lower median number of lesions (4 vs. 17.5, <i>p</i> = 0.004), a smaller major lesion size (3 cm vs. 5.5 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.082), and a significantly lower tumour burden score (6.32 vs. 18.02, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Similar to recent major clinical trials, one- and three-years OS were 100% and 83%, respectively, after protocol introduction; recurrence patterns were significantly different, with reduced multi-site recurrences (7.7% vs. 50%, <i>p</i> = 0.048) and a higher incidence of lung-only recurrences in the LITORALE group (50% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.033). <b>Conclusions</b>: The introduction of the LITORALE protocol significantly influenced patient selection and recurrence patterns in LT for uCRLM. Although the limited number of patients and the short study timespan highlight the need for future validation, these preliminary results support the adoption of structured, multidisciplinary criteria to optimise oncologic outcomes.

CancersVol. 17(12)
Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.