UPDATING SAMPLE PREPARATION IN DETERMINING SUGAR CONTENT IN SUGAR BEET BY POLARIMETRIC METHOD

The aim of the study is to substantiate the options for updating sample preparation using aluminum sulfate clarifier and kieselguhr as a filtering agent when determining sugar content by the polarimetric method. Objectives: to establish the closeness of the results of determining sugar content using lead acetate and aluminum sulfate as clarifiers; to identify the effect of using kieselguhr as a filtering agent on the result of determining sugar content. The object of the study is a laboratory version of the polarimetric method for determining sugar content by the cold water digestion method. The study was conducted in 4 options: 1 – lead acetate clarifier; 2 – aluminum sulfate clarifier; 3 – lead acetate clarifier, control for option 4; 4 – lead acetate clarifier, kieselguhr at a dose of 2 g. The contingency of the results for options 1 and 2, 3 and 4 was assessed on different samples of 30 sugar beet samples. In variants 1 and 2, the sugar content in the sugar beet samples varied from 15.52 to 20.26 %; the difference was from 0 to 0.08 %; on average, it was absent, with an absolute error of the method of 0.2 %. In variants 3 and 4, the sugar content varied from 15.36 to 19.10 %; the difference was from 0.02 to 0.17 %; on average, 0.06 %. The data distribution in all samples is normal. The actual value of the Student's t-test for variants 1 and 2 was 0.0066; variants 3 and 4 – 0.1209, which is significantly lower than the tabulated 2.002; Fisher's criterion, respectively, 1.01 and 1.05, below the tabulated 1.91; the p-value of 0.99 is much higher than the established 0.05. The results showed no differences between the sugar content values determined with different clarifiers, as well as with and without the use of a filtering agent. The data obtained made it possible to justify the possibility of introducing appropriate changes into the sugar content determination method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of KSAU
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2025-5-304-312
Primary Topic
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UPDATING SAMPLE PREPARATION IN DETERMINING SUGAR CONTENT IN SUGAR BEET BY POLARIMETRIC METHOD

L. Yu. Smirnova, Marina Egorova, Lyubov Puzanova
Bulletin of KSAU
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
article

UPDATING SAMPLE PREPARATION IN DETERMINING SUGAR CONTENT IN SUGAR BEET BY POLARIMETRIC METHOD

L. Yu. Smirnova, Marina Egorova, Lyubov Puzanova
article en

Abstract

The aim of the study is to substantiate the options for updating sample preparation using aluminum sulfate clarifier and kieselguhr as a filtering agent when determining sugar content by the polarimetric method. Objectives: to establish the closeness of the results of determining sugar content using lead acetate and aluminum sulfate as clarifiers; to identify the effect of using kieselguhr as a filtering agent on the result of determining sugar content. The object of the study is a laboratory version of the polarimetric method for determining sugar content by the cold water digestion method. The study was conducted in 4 options: 1 – lead acetate clarifier; 2 – aluminum sulfate clarifier; 3 – lead acetate clarifier, control for option 4; 4 – lead acetate clarifier, kieselguhr at a dose of 2 g. The contingency of the results for options 1 and 2, 3 and 4 was assessed on different samples of 30 sugar beet samples. In variants 1 and 2, the sugar content in the sugar beet samples varied from 15.52 to 20.26 %; the difference was from 0 to 0.08 %; on average, it was absent, with an absolute error of the method of 0.2 %. In variants 3 and 4, the sugar content varied from 15.36 to 19.10 %; the difference was from 0.02 to 0.17 %; on average, 0.06 %. The data distribution in all samples is normal. The actual value of the Student's t-test for variants 1 and 2 was 0.0066; variants 3 and 4 – 0.1209, which is significantly lower than the tabulated 2.002; Fisher's criterion, respectively, 1.01 and 1.05, below the tabulated 1.91; the p-value of 0.99 is much higher than the established 0.05. The results showed no differences between the sugar content values determined with different clarifiers, as well as with and without the use of a filtering agent. The data obtained made it possible to justify the possibility of introducing appropriate changes into the sugar content determination method.

Bulletin of KSAUVol. 0(5)
Kursk Federal Agrarian Scientific Center (RU)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.