Unrestricted Earth Return, Planetary Protection and the Wisdom of the Precautionary Principle

We live in a new era of space exploration where robotic spacecraft can be sent out to deep space and retrieve samples of our moon, planets, and icy moons for direct return to Earth. These sample return missions are now mounted by diverse international space agencies as well as private industry, but without international planetary protection protocols necessary to prevent a back contamination event involving any alien microbes. The organizations that allow for these missions (Category V) to proceed are the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) and the Space Studies Board (SSB), which has been allowing Unrestricted Earth Return (hereafter UER) from samples of Small Solar System Bodies such as comets and asteroids. These samples are brought directly to Earth-based laboratories for study without any of them being certified to handle harmful or deadly pathogenic organisms if these are found. Although little is decisively known about the potential of comet and asteroid samples to contain harmful pathogens, the decision to allow UER’s is based on the “assumption” based on a possibly incorrect scientific opinion that comets and asteroids are indeed dead lifeless objects. The rationale for this assumption is centered on the estimated 4700 metric tons of Interplanetary Dust Particles (IDP’s) from comets and asteroids that settle to the surface of Earth each year without having any substantial evidence of adverse global effects that we are aware of and therefore is considered “biosphere safe”. But is it? We ourselves have good reason to challenge this assertion. Moreover, SSB recommendations point out that while the risk of back contamination from UER missions is very low, it is not zero.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2025.152008
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unrestricted Earth Return, Planetary Protection and the Wisdom of the Precautionary Principle

N. C. Wickramasinghe, Barry E. DiGregorio, Gensuke Tokoro
International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
article

Unrestricted Earth Return, Planetary Protection and the Wisdom of the Precautionary Principle

N. C. Wickramasinghe, Barry E. DiGregorio, Gensuke Tokoro
article en

Abstract

We live in a new era of space exploration where robotic spacecraft can be sent out to deep space and retrieve samples of our moon, planets, and icy moons for direct return to Earth. These sample return missions are now mounted by diverse international space agencies as well as private industry, but without international planetary protection protocols necessary to prevent a back contamination event involving any alien microbes. The organizations that allow for these missions (Category V) to proceed are the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) and the Space Studies Board (SSB), which has been allowing Unrestricted Earth Return (hereafter UER) from samples of Small Solar System Bodies such as comets and asteroids. These samples are brought directly to Earth-based laboratories for study without any of them being certified to handle harmful or deadly pathogenic organisms if these are found. Although little is decisively known about the potential of comet and asteroid samples to contain harmful pathogens, the decision to allow UER’s is based on the “assumption” based on a possibly incorrect scientific opinion that comets and asteroids are indeed dead lifeless objects. The rationale for this assumption is centered on the estimated 4700 metric tons of Interplanetary Dust Particles (IDP’s) from comets and asteroids that settle to the surface of Earth each year without having any substantial evidence of adverse global effects that we are aware of and therefore is considered “biosphere safe”. But is it? We ourselves have good reason to challenge this assertion. Moreover, SSB recommendations point out that while the risk of back contamination from UER missions is very low, it is not zero.

International Journal of Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 15(02)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.