Interpreters and Linguistic Difference in Herodotus and Beyond

Herodotus sometimes breaks the general rule in Greek literature by which the whole world converses in effortless Greek. The most notable way he does this is through the presence of linguistic interpreters or other multilingual intermediaries. Less remarked on but similar in effect are situations in which the historian explicitly notes what language (Greek or otherwise) a conversation took place in and episodes in which language barriers prevent communication altogether. This paper examines how such acknowledgements of linguistic difference serve as a distancing device to highlight other kinds of differences between characters, including the political distance between kings and royal subjects, cultural differences between Greeks and others, and, during Croesus’ encounter with Cyrus on the pyre, philosophical differences between the wise and the foolish. It considers examples from Herodotus’ Histories alongside similar episodes in Xenophon’s Anabasis, with a coda on the reuse and adaptation of the device in Plutarch’s Parallel Lives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Histos
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/histos709
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreters and Linguistic Difference in Herodotus and Beyond

Edward Nolan
Histos
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Interpreters and Linguistic Difference in Herodotus and Beyond

Edward Nolan
article en

Abstract

Herodotus sometimes breaks the general rule in Greek literature by which the whole world converses in effortless Greek. The most notable way he does this is through the presence of linguistic interpreters or other multilingual intermediaries. Less remarked on but similar in effect are situations in which the historian explicitly notes what language (Greek or otherwise) a conversation took place in and episodes in which language barriers prevent communication altogether. This paper examines how such acknowledgements of linguistic difference serve as a distancing device to highlight other kinds of differences between characters, including the political distance between kings and royal subjects, cultural differences between Greeks and others, and, during Croesus’ encounter with Cyrus on the pyre, philosophical differences between the wise and the foolish. It considers examples from Herodotus’ Histories alongside similar episodes in Xenophon’s Anabasis, with a coda on the reuse and adaptation of the device in Plutarch’s Parallel Lives.

HistosVol. 19
National Science and Technology Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.