Power and Praise: The Case of the Late Brezhnev Era

ABSTRACT The culture of praise in the late Brezhnev era was highly developed and ritualistic. This research explores the purpose of praise in Soviet society and maps out its different faces through a structural analysis of letters to the editor. We conceptualize praise as a kind of symbolic capital that Soviet citizens use to signal their loyalty to one another. Soviet citizens expressed agreement through public praise of others published on the pages of widely‐circulated newspapers. The analysis demonstrates variation in the structure of praise that depends on its direction, location, topics and the identities of givers and receivers. We identify three stable types of praise—peer valorization, clientelistic, and paternalistic praise. Soviet citizens used these faces of praise to exchange with others in different situations, but also helped reproduce Soviet authority by highlighting the achievements of others up and down the social ladder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology Lens
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.70001
Primary Topic
Social and Cultural Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power and Praise: The Case of the Late Brezhnev Era

Jeffrey K. Hass, A. E. Buck
Sociology Lens
Social and Cultural Dynamics
article

Power and Praise: The Case of the Late Brezhnev Era

Jeffrey K. Hass, A. E. Buck
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The culture of praise in the late Brezhnev era was highly developed and ritualistic. This research explores the purpose of praise in Soviet society and maps out its different faces through a structural analysis of letters to the editor. We conceptualize praise as a kind of symbolic capital that Soviet citizens use to signal their loyalty to one another. Soviet citizens expressed agreement through public praise of others published on the pages of widely‐circulated newspapers. The analysis demonstrates variation in the structure of praise that depends on its direction, location, topics and the identities of givers and receivers. We identify three stable types of praise—peer valorization, clientelistic, and paternalistic praise. Soviet citizens used these faces of praise to exchange with others in different situations, but also helped reproduce Soviet authority by highlighting the achievements of others up and down the social ladder.

Sociology LensVol. 38(3)
University of Southern Indiana (US), University of Richmond (US)
International Research and Exchanges Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Social and Cultural Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.