Virtual care delivery in Saskatchewan: Multi-stakeholder perspectives on implementation, appropriateness, and evaluation

The purpose of this study was to provide an update on patients', clinicians', and health administrators' experiences and perspectives on opportunities, barriers, and priorities for virtual care to inform health policy and planning as virtual care programs continue to mature and develop. Three surveys were developed and distributed in Saskatchewan, Canada. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests, and free-text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Chronic disease management and mental health disorders were identified as highly suitable for virtual care. Health administrators underscored cost savings and improved patient access as key advantages, though they lacked consistent frameworks to assess virtual care effectiveness. Key barriers included digital literacy, technology constraints, and compensation models not aligned with virtual service provision. Participants called for greater infrastructure investment, technical support, and integrated electronic platforms. These insights may inform policy and practice to strengthen virtual health delivery and support health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare Management Forum
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251348858
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual care delivery in Saskatchewan: Multi-stakeholder perspectives on implementation, appropriateness, and evaluation

Scott Adams, Sarah-Marie Durr, Laureen J. McIntyre, Amy Zarzeczny et al.
Healthcare Management Forum
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Virtual care delivery in Saskatchewan: Multi-stakeholder perspectives on implementation, appropriateness, and evaluation

Scott Adams, Sarah-Marie Durr, Laureen J. McIntyre, Amy Zarzeczny, Paul Babyn, Abd Alras, Stacey Lovo, Ivar M. Mendez, Hamza Dani
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide an update on patients', clinicians', and health administrators' experiences and perspectives on opportunities, barriers, and priorities for virtual care to inform health policy and planning as virtual care programs continue to mature and develop. Three surveys were developed and distributed in Saskatchewan, Canada. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests, and free-text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Chronic disease management and mental health disorders were identified as highly suitable for virtual care. Health administrators underscored cost savings and improved patient access as key advantages, though they lacked consistent frameworks to assess virtual care effectiveness. Key barriers included digital literacy, technology constraints, and compensation models not aligned with virtual service provision. Participants called for greater infrastructure investment, technical support, and integrated electronic platforms. These insights may inform policy and practice to strengthen virtual health delivery and support health equity.

Healthcare Management ForumVol. 38(5)
University of Regina (CA), Saskatchewan Health Authority (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.