Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Impact of a Small Genetic Panel for Kidney Disease: A Multicenter, Retrospective European Study

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a genetic origin in 10% of patients. The most effective and cost-beneficial genetic testing methodology is debated. A multicenter, retrospective analysis of 692 patients with panel genetic testing (44 genes) evaluated the diagnostic yield, independent predictors of genetic diagnoses, and clinical impact. Diagnostic variants identified totaled 252, resulting in a 36% yield. The highest yields were associated with cystic disease (49%). No diagnostic variants were identified in unknown CKD. Independent clinical predictors of diagnosis were clinical presentation, family history, and early disease onset. Genetic diagnoses confirmed clinical suspicion in 70%, defined the diagnosis in 23%, and altered clinical diagnosis in 7%. Despite study limitations, a 44 gene panel seems to have a similar diagnostic yield as larger panels and whole-exome sequencing (WES) approaches. Patient selection based on independent predictors of genetic diagnosis may further increase diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness, especially useful in cost-restricted contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Genetics
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.70002
Primary Topic
Renal and related cancers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Impact of a Small Genetic Panel for Kidney Disease: A Multicenter, Retrospective European Study

Antonio Poyatos-Andújar, Francesca Testa, Maria Ferri, Marta Évora García et al.
Clinical Genetics
Renal and related cancers
article

Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Impact of a Small Genetic Panel for Kidney Disease: A Multicenter, Retrospective European Study

Antonio Poyatos-Andújar, Francesca Testa, Maria Ferri, Marta Évora García, Giulia Ligabue, Lucia Artuso, Elena Tenedini, Riccardo Magistroni, Almudena Ávila‐Fernández, Laura Massella, Marco Marino, Marco Ferrarini, Dino Gibertoni, Antonio Percesepe, Davide Martorana, Antonio Terracciano, Johanna Chester, Olga Calabrese, Gaetano Alfano, Carmen Ayuso, Ana Bustamante‐Aragonés, Enrico Tagliafico, Silvia Giovanella
article en

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a genetic origin in 10% of patients. The most effective and cost-beneficial genetic testing methodology is debated. A multicenter, retrospective analysis of 692 patients with panel genetic testing (44 genes) evaluated the diagnostic yield, independent predictors of genetic diagnoses, and clinical impact. Diagnostic variants identified totaled 252, resulting in a 36% yield. The highest yields were associated with cystic disease (49%). No diagnostic variants were identified in unknown CKD. Independent clinical predictors of diagnosis were clinical presentation, family history, and early disease onset. Genetic diagnoses confirmed clinical suspicion in 70%, defined the diagnosis in 23%, and altered clinical diagnosis in 7%. Despite study limitations, a 44 gene panel seems to have a similar diagnostic yield as larger panels and whole-exome sequencing (WES) approaches. Patient selection based on independent predictors of genetic diagnosis may further increase diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness, especially useful in cost-restricted contexts.

Clinical GeneticsVol. 109(1)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Parma (IT), Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT), Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves (ES), Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT), Ospedale di Parma (IT), National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (US), University of Bologna (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Renal and related cancers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.