Changes in healthcare utilization and costs following enrollment in an interprofessional primary care clinic designed to address clinical and social vulnerabilities

Meeting the needs of patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), complex comorbidity, and social determinants of poor health is challenging in traditional primary care environments. Interprofessional primary care (IPC) can better address these needs and may reduce acute care utilization and healthcare costs. We used a retrospective cohort study design (<i>n</i> = 994 patients) to compare healthcare utilization and costs 2 years before and after patients enrolled in an IPC model in the US Veterans Health Administration. Patients were grouped based on histories of high emergency department (ED) use, SUDs, homelessness, and combinations of these vulnerabilities. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) tested for differences in utilization and costs across groups. Following IPC enrollment, primary care visits and costs increased overall (adjusted increase = 2.90-7.24 visits/person-year; $1,032-$2,817/person-year). Among patients with prior high ED use, acute care costs declined; among patients without prior high ED use, acute care costs were mixed and ED use increased. Total costs decreased, were neutral, and increased for patients with 3, 1-2, and no vulnerabilities, respectively. Primary care engagement, reduced acute care, and limited cost increases suggest high value in this IPC model and highlight the need to further study IPC in addressing addiction and social determinants of poor health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2507968
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in healthcare utilization and costs following enrollment in an interprofessional primary care clinic designed to address clinical and social vulnerabilities

Adam J. Gordon, Minkyoung Yoo, A. Taylor Kelley, Richard E. Nelson et al.
2 citations
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
2.71
article

Changes in healthcare utilization and costs following enrollment in an interprofessional primary care clinic designed to address clinical and social vulnerabilities

Adam J. Gordon, Minkyoung Yoo, A. Taylor Kelley, Richard E. Nelson, Audrey L. Jones, Ying Suo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Meeting the needs of patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), complex comorbidity, and social determinants of poor health is challenging in traditional primary care environments. Interprofessional primary care (IPC) can better address these needs and may reduce acute care utilization and healthcare costs. We used a retrospective cohort study design (<i>n</i> = 994 patients) to compare healthcare utilization and costs 2 years before and after patients enrolled in an IPC model in the US Veterans Health Administration. Patients were grouped based on histories of high emergency department (ED) use, SUDs, homelessness, and combinations of these vulnerabilities. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) tested for differences in utilization and costs across groups. Following IPC enrollment, primary care visits and costs increased overall (adjusted increase = 2.90-7.24 visits/person-year; $1,032-$2,817/person-year). Among patients with prior high ED use, acute care costs declined; among patients without prior high ED use, acute care costs were mixed and ED use increased. Total costs decreased, were neutral, and increased for patients with 3, 1-2, and no vulnerabilities, respectively. Primary care engagement, reduced acute care, and limited cost increases suggest high value in this IPC model and highlight the need to further study IPC in addressing addiction and social determinants of poor health.

Journal of Interprofessional CareVol. 39(6)
Intermountain Healthcare (US), University of Utah (US), VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System (US)
University of Utah
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.