Artificial intelligence in university teaching: Skills, perception, and technological integration in university teachers

The overall objective was to describe the use of artificial intelligence in university teaching, based on the skills, perception, and technological integration of university teachers. To this end, a quantitative paradigm was used, with descriptive field research, a non-experimental cross-sectional design, and a population represented by 72 university teachers with a finite sample, consisting of those who voluntarily agreed to participate in the research. The results were presented in a table that analyzed frequency and percentage, showing that most university teachers recognize the potential of artificial intelligence in teaching, using it moderately and with a critical attitude. However, limitations in training, technical support, and autonomy in its pedagogical implementation were still identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prohominum
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47606/acven/ph0347
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in university teaching: Skills, perception, and technological integration in university teachers

Keila Soledad Macedo Inca, Guillermo Romaní Pillpe, Carlos Alberto Hernández Acasiete, Eddy Gladys Esplana Paitan et al.
Prohominum
Educational Innovations and Technology
article

Artificial intelligence in university teaching: Skills, perception, and technological integration in university teachers

Keila Soledad Macedo Inca, Guillermo Romaní Pillpe, Carlos Alberto Hernández Acasiete, Eddy Gladys Esplana Paitan, Gaspar Tapara Celso
article en

Abstract

The overall objective was to describe the use of artificial intelligence in university teaching, based on the skills, perception, and technological integration of university teachers. To this end, a quantitative paradigm was used, with descriptive field research, a non-experimental cross-sectional design, and a population represented by 72 university teachers with a finite sample, consisting of those who voluntarily agreed to participate in the research. The results were presented in a table that analyzed frequency and percentage, showing that most university teachers recognize the potential of artificial intelligence in teaching, using it moderately and with a critical attitude. However, limitations in training, technical support, and autonomy in its pedagogical implementation were still identified.

ProhominumVol. 7(2)
Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Saint Aloysius Gonzaga National University (PE), Universidad Nacional de Huancavelica (PE), Universidad para el Desarrollo Andino (PE), Universidad del Desarrollo del Estado de Puebla (MX)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Educational Innovations and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial intelligence in university teaching: Skills, perception, and technological integration in university teachers — Keila Soledad Macedo Inca, Guillermo Romaní Pillpe, et al. · Prohominum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS