A Qualitative Analysis of the #<scp>MeToo</scp> Online Sphere

ABSTRACT #MeToo ‘went viral’ in 2017 as a way for survivors of sexual victimisation to share their experience and raise awareness of sexual victimisation. How #MeToo impacted the wellbeing of individuals has yet to be examined qualitatively. The current study describes survivors' perceptions about the impacts of #MeToo. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 51 participants with histories of sexual victimisation who either disclosed ( n = 37 [20 in person, 17 online and in person]) or did not disclose ( n = 14); M age = 29.6 (SD = 7.92) years old, cisgender female (82.4%), non‐White (22.3%) and heterosexual (48.9%). Thematic analysis revealed both positive and negative perceived impacts of the #MeToo online sphere in accordance with the social‐ecological model. Results are categorised into the following groups: Individual level factors: (1) increased awareness of prevalence, and (2) lack of belonging; Interpersonal level factors: (3) facilitation of conversations, and (4) negative conversations about sexual victimisation; Community level factors: (5) increased feeling of community, connection and empowerment; and Policy level factors: (6) need for access to more tangible resources, and (7) backlash of #MeToo. No themes fell in the ‘Institutional level factors’ group of the SEM model. How #MeToo impacted the wellbeing of individuals at various levels (individual, interpersonal, community and policy level) is discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70128
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Analysis of the #MeToo Online Sphere

Prachi H. Bhuptani, Lindsay M. Orchowski, Roselyn S. Peterson, Ellie Kim et al.
1 citations
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
3.87
article

A Qualitative Analysis of the #MeToo Online Sphere

Prachi H. Bhuptani, Lindsay M. Orchowski, Roselyn S. Peterson, Ellie Kim, Elizabeth D. Mayer, Reina Kiefer, Margarita Cruz‐Sánchez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT #MeToo ‘went viral’ in 2017 as a way for survivors of sexual victimisation to share their experience and raise awareness of sexual victimisation. How #MeToo impacted the wellbeing of individuals has yet to be examined qualitatively. The current study describes survivors' perceptions about the impacts of #MeToo. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 51 participants with histories of sexual victimisation who either disclosed ( n = 37 [20 in person, 17 online and in person]) or did not disclose ( n = 14); M age = 29.6 (SD = 7.92) years old, cisgender female (82.4%), non‐White (22.3%) and heterosexual (48.9%). Thematic analysis revealed both positive and negative perceived impacts of the #MeToo online sphere in accordance with the social‐ecological model. Results are categorised into the following groups: Individual level factors: (1) increased awareness of prevalence, and (2) lack of belonging; Interpersonal level factors: (3) facilitation of conversations, and (4) negative conversations about sexual victimisation; Community level factors: (5) increased feeling of community, connection and empowerment; and Policy level factors: (6) need for access to more tangible resources, and (7) backlash of #MeToo. No themes fell in the ‘Institutional level factors’ group of the SEM model. How #MeToo impacted the wellbeing of individuals at various levels (individual, interpersonal, community and policy level) is discussed.

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 35(4)
University of Rhode Island (US), Providence College (US), Brown University (US), Rhode Island Hospital (US)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institute on Drug Abuse
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.