The Logic of Pan-securitization: A Investigation of the EU’s Resilience Construction Policy

The Resilience Building Policy(RBP) of the European Union is in the alienation stage of Pan-securitization. Until 2020, EU’s RBP is based on risk response to address national vulnerabilities. However, after the EU thought about economic issues from the perspective of security, its RBP began to Pan-securitization alienation, and the de-risking policies is a typical representative of this alienation. The construction of Pan-securitization has the following three continuous mechanisms: 1. Narrative Construction; 2. Agenda Setting; 3. Policy Expansion. Based on this theoretical framework, we can find that EU’s conflictual narrative has shaped the policy consensus for the de-risking policies. On this basis, relevant the EU actors strive to promote the de-risking agenda into the policy process and become policy outcome; Finally, policy diffusion both inside and outside of the EU further promotes the implementation of de-risking policies. Overall, a shift from risk-based to threat-based Pan-securitization resilience building is practically difficult to achieve its policy objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62557/2394-6296.120201
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Logic of Pan-securitization: A Investigation of the EU’s Resilience Construction Policy

Tao Zhang, Huang Dengxue
International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies
Global Security and Public Health
article

The Logic of Pan-securitization: A Investigation of the EU’s Resilience Construction Policy

Tao Zhang, Huang Dengxue
article en

Abstract

The Resilience Building Policy(RBP) of the European Union is in the alienation stage of Pan-securitization. Until 2020, EU’s RBP is based on risk response to address national vulnerabilities. However, after the EU thought about economic issues from the perspective of security, its RBP began to Pan-securitization alienation, and the de-risking policies is a typical representative of this alienation. The construction of Pan-securitization has the following three continuous mechanisms: 1. Narrative Construction; 2. Agenda Setting; 3. Policy Expansion. Based on this theoretical framework, we can find that EU’s conflictual narrative has shaped the policy consensus for the de-risking policies. On this basis, relevant the EU actors strive to promote the de-risking agenda into the policy process and become policy outcome; Finally, policy diffusion both inside and outside of the EU further promotes the implementation of de-risking policies. Overall, a shift from risk-based to threat-based Pan-securitization resilience building is practically difficult to achieve its policy objectives.

International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social StudiesVol. 12(2)
Shandong University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.