Comparison of Impedance Eduction Test Rigs with Different Boundary-Layer Profiles

The experimental characterization of acoustic liners has garnered significant attention within the research community. Typically, such characterization involves measuring the acoustic impedance of liners using various techniques under conditions similar to those found in turbofan engines. This study aims to offer a comparative analysis of educed acoustic impedance for two liner samples, manufactured by the same provider and tested in the UFSC Impedance Test Rig and the NASA GFIT. Leveraging the distinct geometries of these test rigs, the investigation considers the impact of different grazing flow profiles in terms of the boundary-layer displacement thickness on the educed impedance. Notably, impedance measurements exhibit congruent outcomes in the absence of grazing flow but diverge in terms of resistance values when grazing flow is present, with the UFSC Impedance Test Rig consistently indicating higher values. The postprocessing algorithms of both institutions are uniform. In addition, a comparison involving a semiempirical predictive model has been conducted. The findings suggest that the observed disparities relate to the grazing flow boundary-layer profile. In summary, it is important to report both the mean flow Mach number and the displacement thickness to enable proper comparison between impedances educed from data acquired in different test rigs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j065173
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Impedance Eduction Test Rigs with Different Boundary-Layer Profiles

Michael G. Jones, Júlio A. Cordioli, Brian M. Howerton, Lucas A. Bonomo et al.
3 citations
AIAA Journal
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
14.98
article

Comparison of Impedance Eduction Test Rigs with Different Boundary-Layer Profiles

Michael G. Jones, Júlio A. Cordioli, Brian M. Howerton, Lucas A. Bonomo, Douglas M. Nark, Francesco Avallone, Nicolas T. Quintino
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The experimental characterization of acoustic liners has garnered significant attention within the research community. Typically, such characterization involves measuring the acoustic impedance of liners using various techniques under conditions similar to those found in turbofan engines. This study aims to offer a comparative analysis of educed acoustic impedance for two liner samples, manufactured by the same provider and tested in the UFSC Impedance Test Rig and the NASA GFIT. Leveraging the distinct geometries of these test rigs, the investigation considers the impact of different grazing flow profiles in terms of the boundary-layer displacement thickness on the educed impedance. Notably, impedance measurements exhibit congruent outcomes in the absence of grazing flow but diverge in terms of resistance values when grazing flow is present, with the UFSC Impedance Test Rig consistently indicating higher values. The postprocessing algorithms of both institutions are uniform. In addition, a comparison involving a semiempirical predictive model has been conducted. The findings suggest that the observed disparities relate to the grazing flow boundary-layer profile. In summary, it is important to report both the mean flow Mach number and the displacement thickness to enable proper comparison between impedances educed from data acquired in different test rigs.

AIAA JournalVol. 63(11)
Langley Research Center (US), Politecnico di Torino (IT), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
14.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Impedance Eduction Test Rigs with Different Boundary-Layer Profiles — Michael G. Jones, Júlio A. Cordioli, et al. · AIAA Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS