Further Remarks on the Infinity Tree

A 2023 paper discussed how the real numbers between 0 and 1 could be represented by an infinite tree structure called the “infinity tree”, which contains only a countably infinite number of nodes and arcs. A 2025 paper discussed how a finite-state Turing machine could, in a countably infinite number of state transitions, write all the infinite paths in the infinity tree to a countably infinite tape, supporting an argument that the real numbers in the interval [0, 1] are countably infinite, in a non-Cantorian theory of infinity. However, it is not claimed that there is an error in Cantor’s arguments that [0, 1] is uncountably infinite. Rather, the situation is considered as a paradox, resulting from different choices about how to represent and count the continuum of real numbers. The present, short paper addresses some further questions that mathematicians have asked, and might ask, about this approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Pure Mathematics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2025.156019
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Further Remarks on the Infinity Tree

Philip C. Jackson
Advances in Pure Mathematics
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
article

Further Remarks on the Infinity Tree

Philip C. Jackson
article en

Abstract

A 2023 paper discussed how the real numbers between 0 and 1 could be represented by an infinite tree structure called the “infinity tree”, which contains only a countably infinite number of nodes and arcs. A 2025 paper discussed how a finite-state Turing machine could, in a countably infinite number of state transitions, write all the infinite paths in the infinity tree to a countably infinite tape, supporting an argument that the real numbers in the interval [0, 1] are countably infinite, in a non-Cantorian theory of infinity. However, it is not claimed that there is an error in Cantor’s arguments that [0, 1] is uncountably infinite. Rather, the situation is considered as a paradox, resulting from different choices about how to represent and count the continuum of real numbers. The present, short paper addresses some further questions that mathematicians have asked, and might ask, about this approach.

Advances in Pure MathematicsVol. 15(06)
Troy Gastroenterology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.