The British and Brazilian expeditions and the 1919 total solar eclipse: regimes of labour and degrees of invisibility

In this paper, we dissect how different regimes of labour were crucial to the success of the British and Brazilian expeditions which observed the 1919 total solar eclipse in Príncipe and Sobral. We connect regimes of labour with degrees of invisibility and discuss plausible justifications for various absences/presences in the written records. We discuss reasons for the inclusion of Cottingham, the artisan-technician expert on clockwork mechanisms, into the teams; the entanglements of forced labour with scientific and technical work in Príncipe; and the various regimes of labour in place at Sobral. We argue that the impact of various regimes of labour in Príncipe and Sobral cannot be confined to the provision of infrastructural support, but include critical location choices, the possibility of scientific success during the observations themselves, and the processing of plates following observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal for the History of Science
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087425000305
Citations
1
Primary Topic
History and Developments in Astronomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The British and Brazilian expeditions and the 1919 total solar eclipse: regimes of labour and degrees of invisibility

Hugo Soares, Ana Simões, Luís Miguel Carolino
1 citations
The British Journal for the History of Science
History and Developments in Astronomy
1.15
article

The British and Brazilian expeditions and the 1919 total solar eclipse: regimes of labour and degrees of invisibility

Hugo Soares, Ana Simões, Luís Miguel Carolino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we dissect how different regimes of labour were crucial to the success of the British and Brazilian expeditions which observed the 1919 total solar eclipse in Príncipe and Sobral. We connect regimes of labour with degrees of invisibility and discuss plausible justifications for various absences/presences in the written records. We discuss reasons for the inclusion of Cottingham, the artisan-technician expert on clockwork mechanisms, into the teams; the entanglements of forced labour with scientific and technical work in Príncipe; and the various regimes of labour in place at Sobral. We argue that the impact of various regimes of labour in Príncipe and Sobral cannot be confined to the provision of infrastructural support, but include critical location choices, the possibility of scientific success during the observations themselves, and the processing of plates following observations.

The British Journal for the History of ScienceVol. 58(3)
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), University of Lisbon (PT), Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Decent work and economic growth, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
History and Developments in Astronomy
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The British and Brazilian expeditions and the 1919 total solar eclipse: regimes of labour and degrees of invisibility — Hugo Soares, Ana Simões, et al. · The British Journal for the History of Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS