Global land rush and local resistance: political struggles in ‘failed’ land deals

This paper examines two cases of land deals in Kachin State, Myanmar, using a case study approach informed by critical agrarian studies and a landscape perspective. The research draws on household surveys and interviews to analyze an 80,000-hectare corporate-pursued biofuel crop concession and a 58,000 hectare ‘pin prick’ land accumulation for banana plantations. Immersed in the broader political economy of geopolitics, dispossession, and armed conflict, both cases reveal that while most studies focused on operational land deals, ‘failed’ land deals are also sites of important and complex political struggles. However, outcomes of land struggles–whether in the form of ‘public victory’ or ‘silent return’ (of land to people; of people to the land)–do not necessarily translate to socially just outcomes for rural working people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalizations
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2025.2514420
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global land rush and local resistance: political struggles in ‘failed’ land deals

Doi Ra
4 citations
Globalizations
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
19.33
article

Global land rush and local resistance: political struggles in ‘failed’ land deals

Doi Ra
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper examines two cases of land deals in Kachin State, Myanmar, using a case study approach informed by critical agrarian studies and a landscape perspective. The research draws on household surveys and interviews to analyze an 80,000-hectare corporate-pursued biofuel crop concession and a 58,000 hectare ‘pin prick’ land accumulation for banana plantations. Immersed in the broader political economy of geopolitics, dispossession, and armed conflict, both cases reveal that while most studies focused on operational land deals, ‘failed’ land deals are also sites of important and complex political struggles. However, outcomes of land struggles–whether in the form of ‘public victory’ or ‘silent return’ (of land to people; of people to the land)–do not necessarily translate to socially just outcomes for rural working people.

GlobalizationsVol. 22(8)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
European Research Council, International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
19.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global land rush and local resistance: political struggles in ‘failed’ land deals — Doi Ra · Globalizations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS