Landscape‐as‐governance: Exploring agency, embodied sensing and decision preferences

Abstract We introduce landscape‐as‐governance (LAG) as a dynamic landscape property and theoretical approach that uses people's embodied sensing to explain their governance preferences. LAG incorporates enactive‐cognitive and polycentric governance approaches to reveal how sensing and sensemaking influence decision‐making at personal and landscape scales. LAG's novelty lies in showing how personal landscape sensing intertwines social and ecological factors, transforming individual experiences into collective governance norms. While people's interests undoubtedly play the dominant role in determining landscape governance, LAG argues that sensing and sensemaking are crucial components that shape these interests and preferences. LAG suggests that recognising the co‐constituted nature of human agency in landscapes can lead to more reflective, sustainable and equitable governance, emphasising the need for bottom‐up innovation and the integration of sensory experiences into decision‐making processes. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70080
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landscape‐as‐governance: Exploring agency, embodied sensing and decision preferences

Victoria A. Maguire‐Rajpaul, James McGinlay, Nikoleta Jones, Julian Clark
2 citations
People and Nature
Urban Green Space and Health
2.40
article

Landscape‐as‐governance: Exploring agency, embodied sensing and decision preferences

Victoria A. Maguire‐Rajpaul, James McGinlay, Nikoleta Jones, Julian Clark
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We introduce landscape‐as‐governance (LAG) as a dynamic landscape property and theoretical approach that uses people's embodied sensing to explain their governance preferences. LAG incorporates enactive‐cognitive and polycentric governance approaches to reveal how sensing and sensemaking influence decision‐making at personal and landscape scales. LAG's novelty lies in showing how personal landscape sensing intertwines social and ecological factors, transforming individual experiences into collective governance norms. While people's interests undoubtedly play the dominant role in determining landscape governance, LAG argues that sensing and sensemaking are crucial components that shape these interests and preferences. LAG suggests that recognising the co‐constituted nature of human agency in landscapes can lead to more reflective, sustainable and equitable governance, emphasising the need for bottom‐up innovation and the integration of sensory experiences into decision‐making processes. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 7(7)
University of Warwick (GB), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
University of Birmingham
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Urban Green Space and Health
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Landscape‐as‐governance: Exploring agency, embodied sensing and decision preferences — Victoria A. Maguire‐Rajpaul, James McGinlay, et al. · People and Nature (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS