Ranking the Properties Important for Understanding Noncovalent Bond Strength

The interaction energies within noncovalent bonds can be partitioned into electrostatic, induction, and dispersive attractive elements. A set of complexes comprising halogen, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bonds, are studied by quantum chemical calculations to assess how each of these components can be understood on the basis of properties of the constituent monomers. The variation of the electrostatic term, which accounts for over half of the total attractive energy, can be approximated, but with only modest accuracy, by combination of the maximum and minimum of the electrostatic potential on the two subunits. Induction represents a smaller contribution to the total, but is well connected with the NBO interorbital transfer energy, as opposed to the reciprocal of the HOMO-LUMO gap which behaves quite differently than IND. Of the various AIM parameters, both the bond critical point density and energy density are closely related to the full interaction energy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.70163
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Crystallography and molecular interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ranking the Properties Important for Understanding Noncovalent Bond Strength

Steve Scheiner
4 citations
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Crystallography and molecular interactions
7.01
article

Ranking the Properties Important for Understanding Noncovalent Bond Strength

Steve Scheiner
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The interaction energies within noncovalent bonds can be partitioned into electrostatic, induction, and dispersive attractive elements. A set of complexes comprising halogen, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bonds, are studied by quantum chemical calculations to assess how each of these components can be understood on the basis of properties of the constituent monomers. The variation of the electrostatic term, which accounts for over half of the total attractive energy, can be approximated, but with only modest accuracy, by combination of the maximum and minimum of the electrostatic potential on the two subunits. Induction represents a smaller contribution to the total, but is well connected with the NBO interorbital transfer energy, as opposed to the reciprocal of the HOMO-LUMO gap which behaves quite differently than IND. Of the various AIM parameters, both the bond critical point density and energy density are closely related to the full interaction energy.

Journal of Computational ChemistryVol. 46(17)
Utah State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Crystallography and molecular interactions
7.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ranking the Properties Important for Understanding Noncovalent Bond Strength — Steve Scheiner · Journal of Computational Chemistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS