Evaluation of GNSS ionosphere prediction models Klobuchar-GPS, NTCM-G, and BDGIM: methodology and results for 2021–2024

Abstract As part of their satellite navigation messages, GPS, Galileo, and BDS broadcast coefficients of ionosphere prediction models. These models are intended to be used for the improvement of single-frequency code-based positioning. We compared vertical electron content derived from these models with those of the more accurate post-processing ionosphere model produced by the International GNSS Service (IGS). On a global scale and for the time period 2021–2024, the Klobuchar-GPS model corrects on average about 59% of the vertical ionospheric delays, the NTCM-G model and a slightly modified BDGIM model give a correction rate of about 74%, while the combination of the latter two models gives a correction rate of 77%. In the case of strong geomagnetic storms with large effects on the ionospheric total electron content, the performance of the prediction models degrades and the global daily correction rates may even drop to below 50%. Single-frequency GNSS receivers with access to all GNSS are recommended to apply ionospheric corrections based on the ionosphere model coefficients and algorithms of Galileo/NTCM-G or BDS/modified BDGIM, or a combination of both. The Klobuchar-GPS model should serve as a backup in case that Galileo and BDS navigation messages are not available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GPS Solutions
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-025-01905-w
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of GNSS ionosphere prediction models Klobuchar-GPS, NTCM-G, and BDGIM: methodology and results for 2021–2024

Lambert Wanninger, Kim Thiemann
4 citations
GPS Solutions
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
4.62
article

Evaluation of GNSS ionosphere prediction models Klobuchar-GPS, NTCM-G, and BDGIM: methodology and results for 2021–2024

Lambert Wanninger, Kim Thiemann
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract As part of their satellite navigation messages, GPS, Galileo, and BDS broadcast coefficients of ionosphere prediction models. These models are intended to be used for the improvement of single-frequency code-based positioning. We compared vertical electron content derived from these models with those of the more accurate post-processing ionosphere model produced by the International GNSS Service (IGS). On a global scale and for the time period 2021–2024, the Klobuchar-GPS model corrects on average about 59% of the vertical ionospheric delays, the NTCM-G model and a slightly modified BDGIM model give a correction rate of about 74%, while the combination of the latter two models gives a correction rate of 77%. In the case of strong geomagnetic storms with large effects on the ionospheric total electron content, the performance of the prediction models degrades and the global daily correction rates may even drop to below 50%. Single-frequency GNSS receivers with access to all GNSS are recommended to apply ionospheric corrections based on the ionosphere model coefficients and algorithms of Galileo/NTCM-G or BDS/modified BDGIM, or a combination of both. The Klobuchar-GPS model should serve as a backup in case that Galileo and BDS navigation messages are not available.

GPS SolutionsVol. 29(3)
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Technische Universität Dresden
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.