Green finance for sustainable development: analyzing the effects of green credit on high-polluting firms’ environmental performance

This study empirically evaluates the environmental impact of China’s 2012 Green Credit Guidelines on high-polluting firms, utilizing a panel dataset of A-share listed companies spanning 2006–2022. Applying a Difference-in-Differences (DID) framework, the analysis employs Bloomberg’s ESG environmental score—which comprehensively captures resource efficiency, pollution abatement, and ecological conservation—as a proxy for environmental performance. The findings reveal a statistically significant improvement of 2.3–3.7 points in environmental scores attributable to the policy intervention. According to Bloomberg’s calibration, this improvement corresponds to an estimated annual reduction of 1.2–1.8 million tons of SO₂ emissions, representing 15–22% of China’s mid-term (2020–2025) pollution abatement targets. Robustness checks, including Propensity Score Matching (PSM), placebo tests, and alternative measurements, validate the results. The paper identifies two key mechanisms through which green credit policies affect environmental performance: financing constraints and innovation compensation. Heterogeneity analysis shows that firms in eastern regions, competitive industries, and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) experience greater impacts. This paper contributes to the global discourse on sustainable development, offering evidence of how green credit policies can improve high-polluting firms’ environmental performance based on their region, industry and ownership, and providing recommendations for supporting the transition to a greener economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05218-8
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green finance for sustainable development: analyzing the effects of green credit on high-polluting firms’ environmental performance

Ju He, Yanqiao Zheng, Qiwen Dai, Yue Zhang et al.
4 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
12.52
article

Green finance for sustainable development: analyzing the effects of green credit on high-polluting firms’ environmental performance

Ju He, Yanqiao Zheng, Qiwen Dai, Yue Zhang, Zhongyuan Guo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study empirically evaluates the environmental impact of China’s 2012 Green Credit Guidelines on high-polluting firms, utilizing a panel dataset of A-share listed companies spanning 2006–2022. Applying a Difference-in-Differences (DID) framework, the analysis employs Bloomberg’s ESG environmental score—which comprehensively captures resource efficiency, pollution abatement, and ecological conservation—as a proxy for environmental performance. The findings reveal a statistically significant improvement of 2.3–3.7 points in environmental scores attributable to the policy intervention. According to Bloomberg’s calibration, this improvement corresponds to an estimated annual reduction of 1.2–1.8 million tons of SO₂ emissions, representing 15–22% of China’s mid-term (2020–2025) pollution abatement targets. Robustness checks, including Propensity Score Matching (PSM), placebo tests, and alternative measurements, validate the results. The paper identifies two key mechanisms through which green credit policies affect environmental performance: financing constraints and innovation compensation. Heterogeneity analysis shows that firms in eastern regions, competitive industries, and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) experience greater impacts. This paper contributes to the global discourse on sustainable development, offering evidence of how green credit policies can improve high-polluting firms’ environmental performance based on their region, industry and ownership, and providing recommendations for supporting the transition to a greener economy.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Zhejiang Wanli University (CN), Guangxi Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.