Synchronic vs diachronic approaches in the descriptions of german nominal inflection in the earliest Portuguese textbooks of the german language (1863-1926)

Since the first German language textbook for a Portuguese target audience was published in 1863, the respective authors had to ask themselves not only how to designate the components of the nominal inflection of German nouns, but also how to present them in a classificatory way in order to familiarize their audience with the German declension. Given that the Grimmian diachronic approach was and still is considered authoritative in academic German studies, the question arises as to whether and how the authors of the earliest Portuguese works were guided by this or other approaches. The result will answer the final question of which of the classification approaches might be particularly promising in the context of German as a foreign language.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47421/cfs_76_61-83
Primary Topic
Linguistic Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synchronic vs diachronic approaches in the descriptions of german nominal inflection in the earliest Portuguese textbooks of the german language (1863-1926)

Rolf Kemmler
Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure
Linguistic Education and Pedagogy
article

Synchronic vs diachronic approaches in the descriptions of german nominal inflection in the earliest Portuguese textbooks of the german language (1863-1926)

Rolf Kemmler
article en

Abstract

Since the first German language textbook for a Portuguese target audience was published in 1863, the respective authors had to ask themselves not only how to designate the components of the nominal inflection of German nouns, but also how to present them in a classificatory way in order to familiarize their audience with the German declension. Given that the Grimmian diachronic approach was and still is considered authoritative in academic German studies, the question arises as to whether and how the authors of the earliest Portuguese works were guided by this or other approaches. The result will answer the final question of which of the classification approaches might be particularly promising in the context of German as a foreign language.

Cahiers Ferdinand de SaussureVol. 76
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Linguistic Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.