Dynamically Quantifying Vocal Fold Thickness: Effects of Medialization Implant Location on Glottal Shape and Phonation

Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) can lead to significant dysphonia. Medialization thyroplasty type 1 (TT1) is a common surgical intervention aiming at improving vocal quality by optimally positioning the paralyzed fold to generate the necessary vibrations for phonation. Implants are generally placed through the thyroid cartilage in a sedated patient and positioned either underneath the level of the vocal folds (infraglottal medialization or IM) or at the level of the vocal folds (glottal medialization or GM). Using high-speed three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) in an ex vivo canine hemilarynx model, this study explores the impact of implant location, specifically IM versus GM on the pre-phonatory and dynamic vertical thickness, glottal divergence, flow rate (Q), and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) under varying adduction and subglottal pressure conditions. IM consistently increased glottal divergence and dynamic vertical thickness, particularly in under-adducted states (AL1), despite producing lower static thickness than GM. CPP remained unaffected by the implant condition, but Q decreased significantly with IM under AL1, indicating enhanced glottal resistance and closure. These findings suggest that IM may offer superior functional outcomes by restoring divergent glottal shaping and improving vibratory efficiency. This study also introduces a validated method for dynamically quantifying vocal fold thickness and emphasizes the importance of implant depth in medialization thyroplasty strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060667
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamically Quantifying Vocal Fold Thickness: Effects of Medialization Implant Location on Glottal Shape and Phonation

Rebecca J. Howell, Liran Oren, Ephraim J. Gutmark, Charles Farbos de Luzan et al.
2 citations
Bioengineering
Voice and Speech Disorders
2.33
article

Dynamically Quantifying Vocal Fold Thickness: Effects of Medialization Implant Location on Glottal Shape and Phonation

Rebecca J. Howell, Liran Oren, Ephraim J. Gutmark, Charles Farbos de Luzan, Jacob Michaud-Dorko
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) can lead to significant dysphonia. Medialization thyroplasty type 1 (TT1) is a common surgical intervention aiming at improving vocal quality by optimally positioning the paralyzed fold to generate the necessary vibrations for phonation. Implants are generally placed through the thyroid cartilage in a sedated patient and positioned either underneath the level of the vocal folds (infraglottal medialization or IM) or at the level of the vocal folds (glottal medialization or GM). Using high-speed three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) in an ex vivo canine hemilarynx model, this study explores the impact of implant location, specifically IM versus GM on the pre-phonatory and dynamic vertical thickness, glottal divergence, flow rate (Q), and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) under varying adduction and subglottal pressure conditions. IM consistently increased glottal divergence and dynamic vertical thickness, particularly in under-adducted states (AL1), despite producing lower static thickness than GM. CPP remained unaffected by the implant condition, but Q decreased significantly with IM under AL1, indicating enhanced glottal resistance and closure. These findings suggest that IM may offer superior functional outcomes by restoring divergent glottal shaping and improving vibratory efficiency. This study also introduces a validated method for dynamically quantifying vocal fold thickness and emphasizes the importance of implant depth in medialization thyroplasty strategies.

BioengineeringVol. 12(6)
University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
University of Cincinnati
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Voice and Speech Disorders
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.