The Risk of Ethicalisation in Ethical Engagement with Quantum Technologies: Some Brief Considerations

‘Quantum for good’ is slowly beginning to emerge as an ambition for quantum technology development. As the ambition begins to percolate down through policy and scientific communities, questions as to what ‘quantum for good’ means and how it might be operationalised will arise. Fora for discussion will spring up and, at the individual level, actors will be faced with how to respond to the call for ‘quantum for good’. What might ‘quantum for good’ mean in practice, how can ‘good’ be defined, by whom, etc.? ELSA communities are likely to be involved in these discussions. This contribution warns ELSA scholars of the risks of ‘ethicalisation’ in pondering these questions with respect to two issues: 1) the nature and framing of ethical discussion in new and emerging science and technologies; and 2) reliance on ethics and ethical expertise. Ethicalisation can lead to a hollowing out of ethical concerns through a downplaying of interests, stakes, and, ultimately, politics. The article offers some suggestions for a ‘re-politicisation’ of ethics within the context of engagement with quantum technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NanoEthics
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-025-00471-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Risk of Ethicalisation in Ethical Engagement with Quantum Technologies: Some Brief Considerations

Clare Shelley‐Egan
2 citations
NanoEthics
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
2.86
article

The Risk of Ethicalisation in Ethical Engagement with Quantum Technologies: Some Brief Considerations

Clare Shelley‐Egan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

‘Quantum for good’ is slowly beginning to emerge as an ambition for quantum technology development. As the ambition begins to percolate down through policy and scientific communities, questions as to what ‘quantum for good’ means and how it might be operationalised will arise. Fora for discussion will spring up and, at the individual level, actors will be faced with how to respond to the call for ‘quantum for good’. What might ‘quantum for good’ mean in practice, how can ‘good’ be defined, by whom, etc.? ELSA communities are likely to be involved in these discussions. This contribution warns ELSA scholars of the risks of ‘ethicalisation’ in pondering these questions with respect to two issues: 1) the nature and framing of ethical discussion in new and emerging science and technologies; and 2) reliance on ethics and ethical expertise. Ethicalisation can lead to a hollowing out of ethical concerns through a downplaying of interests, stakes, and, ultimately, politics. The article offers some suggestions for a ‘re-politicisation’ of ethics within the context of engagement with quantum technology.

NanoEthicsVol. 19(2)
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.