Incorporating genetic data improves target trial emulations and informs the use of polygenic scores in randomized controlled trial design

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for evaluating medical interventions, yet ethical, practical and financial constraints often necessitate reliance on observational data and trial emulations. This study explores how integrating genetic data can enhance both emulated and traditional trial designs. Using FinnGen (n = 425,483), we emulated four major cardiometabolic RCTs and showed how reduced differences in polygenic scores (PGS) between trial arms track improvement in study design. Simulation studies reveal that PGS alone cannot fully adjust for unmeasured confounding. Instead, Mendelian randomization analyses can be used to detect likely confounders. Finally, trial emulations provide a platform to assess and refine PGS implementation for genetic enrichment strategies. By comparing associations of PGS with trial outcomes in the general population and emulated trial cohorts, we highlight the need to validate prognostic enrichment approaches in trial-relevant populations. These results highlight the growing potential of incorporating genetic information to optimize clinical trial design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Genetics
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02229-8
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incorporating genetic data improves target trial emulations and informs the use of polygenic scores in randomized controlled trial design

J German, Pradeep Natarajan, Zhiyu Yang, Sarah Urbut et al.
4 citations
Nature Genetics
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
7.27
article

Incorporating genetic data improves target trial emulations and informs the use of polygenic scores in randomized controlled trial design

J German, Pradeep Natarajan, Zhiyu Yang, Sarah Urbut, Andrea Ganna, Zoltán Kutalik, Pekka Vartiainen, Anthony Philippakis
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for evaluating medical interventions, yet ethical, practical and financial constraints often necessitate reliance on observational data and trial emulations. This study explores how integrating genetic data can enhance both emulated and traditional trial designs. Using FinnGen (n = 425,483), we emulated four major cardiometabolic RCTs and showed how reduced differences in polygenic scores (PGS) between trial arms track improvement in study design. Simulation studies reveal that PGS alone cannot fully adjust for unmeasured confounding. Instead, Mendelian randomization analyses can be used to detect likely confounders. Finally, trial emulations provide a platform to assess and refine PGS implementation for genetic enrichment strategies. By comparing associations of PGS with trial outcomes in the general population and emulated trial cohorts, we highlight the need to validate prognostic enrichment approaches in trial-relevant populations. These results highlight the growing potential of incorporating genetic information to optimize clinical trial design.

Nature GeneticsVol. 57(7)
Broad Institute (US), SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), University of Helsinki (FI), Harvard University (US), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FI), Mass General Brigham (US), University of Lausanne (CH)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Biogen, Celgene, Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri, Broad Institute, Maze Therapeutics, Kela, Business Finland, Genentech, Janssen Biotech
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.