Kontroversi Dakwah Gus Miftah dalam Diskursus Digital: Analisis Sosio-Kultural Respon Nitizen

The controversy surrounding Islamic preaching (da'wah) involving a prominent religious figure in Indonesia, Miftah Maulana Habiburrahman, well known as Gus Miftah, arose from his use of the word "Goblok" toward an iced tea seller during a religious gathering (pengajian), which became a topic of public discourse on social media at the end of 2024. The statement triggered a polarized response on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, and Meta, reflecting the dynamics of social and religious values in digital media discourse. This study aims to analyze netizens' responses to the controversy surrounding Gus Miftah's statement as a form of preaching discourse on social media. Using discourse analysis, the study's results showed a polarization of netizen responses into two groups: critical expressions and support. Those who expressed criticism highlighted violations of moral and social norms, while those who supported Gus Miftah's statement emphasized the need to contextualize it properly to avoid misunderstanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Komunikasi Islam
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2025.15.1.100-116
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kontroversi Dakwah Gus Miftah dalam Diskursus Digital: Analisis Sosio-Kultural Respon Nitizen

Mursyid Fikri, INDRIANA INDRIANA
Jurnal Komunikasi Islam
Islamic Finance and Communication
article

Kontroversi Dakwah Gus Miftah dalam Diskursus Digital: Analisis Sosio-Kultural Respon Nitizen

Mursyid Fikri, INDRIANA INDRIANA
article en

Abstract

The controversy surrounding Islamic preaching (da'wah) involving a prominent religious figure in Indonesia, Miftah Maulana Habiburrahman, well known as Gus Miftah, arose from his use of the word "Goblok" toward an iced tea seller during a religious gathering (pengajian), which became a topic of public discourse on social media at the end of 2024. The statement triggered a polarized response on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, and Meta, reflecting the dynamics of social and religious values in digital media discourse. This study aims to analyze netizens' responses to the controversy surrounding Gus Miftah's statement as a form of preaching discourse on social media. Using discourse analysis, the study's results showed a polarization of netizen responses into two groups: critical expressions and support. Those who expressed criticism highlighted violations of moral and social norms, while those who supported Gus Miftah's statement emphasized the need to contextualize it properly to avoid misunderstanding.

Jurnal Komunikasi IslamVol. 15(1)
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Islamic Finance and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kontroversi Dakwah Gus Miftah dalam Diskursus Digital: Analisis Sosio-Kultural Respon Nitizen — Mursyid Fikri, INDRIANA INDRIANA · Jurnal Komunikasi Islam (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS