Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a severe chronic complication of diabetes, are characterized by refractory wounds and high risks of amputation/mortality, posing substantial public health challenges. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) demonstrate therapeutic potential through synergistic mechanisms including paracrine signaling, immunomodulation, neovascularization, and tissue regeneration. This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of MSC-based therapy for DFUs, aiming to optimize treatment strategies with evidence-based insights.MethodWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for RCTs investigating MSC therapy in DFUs. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were selected with pre-defined criteria. Meta-analyses employed random-/fixed-effects models based on I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Primary endpoints encompassed complete healing rate (100% epithelialization), amputation incidence, serious adverse events (SAEs) risk, and recurrence rate. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings. A comprehensive assessment of potential publication bias in the current meta-analysis was performed using Egger's linear regression test, Begg's rank correlation test, and funnel plot visualization.ResultsSix RCTs were included. MSC therapy significantly improved overall complete healing rates (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.23-2.16; <i>P</i> = .0007), particularly in small ulcers (<5 cm<sup>2</sup>; RR = 1.71, 1.11-2.63, <i>P</i> = .02), but showed no efficacy for large ulcers (≥5 cm<sup>2</sup>; RR = 1.18, 0.75-1.86, <i>P</i> = .46). No significant differences emerged in amputation risk (<i>P</i> = .16), serious adverse events (<i>P</i> = .38), and recurrence (<i>P</i> = .33). Low heterogeneity and no publication bias were observed.ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates MSCs therapy significantly enhances wound closure in diabetic foot ulcers, particularly achieving in small ulcers. However, no stable therapeutic benefits were observed for large ulcers, amputation prevention, recurrence reduction, and SAEs. Future multicenter phase III trials with standardized protocols are warranted to establish ulcer stage/size-specific treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251348797
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Rui‐Min Han, X. Mei, Tong Zhang, Min Ge et al.
2 citations
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
2.59
article

Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Rui‐Min Han, X. Mei, Tong Zhang, Min Ge, Na Wu, Ye Tian, Defeng Wang, Li Sun, Yan Yang, B. Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

BackgroundDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a severe chronic complication of diabetes, are characterized by refractory wounds and high risks of amputation/mortality, posing substantial public health challenges. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) demonstrate therapeutic potential through synergistic mechanisms including paracrine signaling, immunomodulation, neovascularization, and tissue regeneration. This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of MSC-based therapy for DFUs, aiming to optimize treatment strategies with evidence-based insights.MethodWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for RCTs investigating MSC therapy in DFUs. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were selected with pre-defined criteria. Meta-analyses employed random-/fixed-effects models based on I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Primary endpoints encompassed complete healing rate (100% epithelialization), amputation incidence, serious adverse events (SAEs) risk, and recurrence rate. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings. A comprehensive assessment of potential publication bias in the current meta-analysis was performed using Egger's linear regression test, Begg's rank correlation test, and funnel plot visualization.ResultsSix RCTs were included. MSC therapy significantly improved overall complete healing rates (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.23-2.16; <i>P</i> = .0007), particularly in small ulcers (<5 cm<sup>2</sup>; RR = 1.71, 1.11-2.63, <i>P</i> = .02), but showed no efficacy for large ulcers (≥5 cm<sup>2</sup>; RR = 1.18, 0.75-1.86, <i>P</i> = .46). No significant differences emerged in amputation risk (<i>P</i> = .16), serious adverse events (<i>P</i> = .38), and recurrence (<i>P</i> = .33). Low heterogeneity and no publication bias were observed.ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates MSCs therapy significantly enhances wound closure in diabetic foot ulcers, particularly achieving in small ulcers. However, no stable therapeutic benefits were observed for large ulcers, amputation prevention, recurrence reduction, and SAEs. Future multicenter phase III trials with standardized protocols are warranted to establish ulcer stage/size-specific treatments.

The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Hebei University of Engineering (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.