Choice, Preference, Rationality

The paper sketches a theoretical framework that has the required expressive power to deal with the phenomenon of preference reversal. This phenomenon is studied in three different contexts: rational choice theory, epistemology, and ethics. A common underlying theme is identified: the so-called higher-order interactions stemming from the epistemic value of the available alternatives. In order to capture them I employ the concept of a relational system. It is shown that this mathematical structure, along with several crucial concepts (regularity, stratifiedness, coherence), is enough to capture the essential features of preference reversal. Building on this insight, the paper proposes several new lines of research, based on the common structure exemplified by these seemingly different domains.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics Science Education
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54664/cbvc8776
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choice, Preference, Rationality

Rosen Lutskanov
Ethics Science Education
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Choice, Preference, Rationality

Rosen Lutskanov
article en

Abstract

The paper sketches a theoretical framework that has the required expressive power to deal with the phenomenon of preference reversal. This phenomenon is studied in three different contexts: rational choice theory, epistemology, and ethics. A common underlying theme is identified: the so-called higher-order interactions stemming from the epistemic value of the available alternatives. In order to capture them I employ the concept of a relational system. It is shown that this mathematical structure, along with several crucial concepts (regularity, stratifiedness, coherence), is enough to capture the essential features of preference reversal. Building on this insight, the paper proposes several new lines of research, based on the common structure exemplified by these seemingly different domains.

Ethics Science EducationVol. 3(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.