‘Artists as workers’? Re-imagining cultural policy for insecure and precarious artists and cultural workers

In recent decades, policymakers have advanced cultural policies aimed at spurring the economic value and employment growth of cultural and creative industries. The Australian government's 2023 cultural policy, Revive , refers to ‘artists as workers’ and champions the ‘centrality of the artist’ in Australian culture. But a closer examination of the conditions of cultural work yields a gloomy perspective on Australian cultural labour markets. This paper collates and analyses Australian Bureau of Statistics employment data to show that cultural work in Australia is poorly paid, unequal, insecure and precarious. Adopting a political economy analysis, we argue that social, cultural and industry policy settings favour large firms at the expense of artists and cultural workers. In response, we propose a number of policy interventions. It is possible to re-imagine a world of cultural work in which strong cultural, social and employment protections allow artists and cultural workers a dignified creative life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of sociology
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833251345856
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Artists as workers’? Re-imagining cultural policy for insecure and precarious artists and cultural workers

Benjamin Carl Eltham, Xin Gu, Marnie Badham
Journal of sociology
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

‘Artists as workers’? Re-imagining cultural policy for insecure and precarious artists and cultural workers

Benjamin Carl Eltham, Xin Gu, Marnie Badham
article en

Abstract

In recent decades, policymakers have advanced cultural policies aimed at spurring the economic value and employment growth of cultural and creative industries. The Australian government's 2023 cultural policy, Revive , refers to ‘artists as workers’ and champions the ‘centrality of the artist’ in Australian culture. But a closer examination of the conditions of cultural work yields a gloomy perspective on Australian cultural labour markets. This paper collates and analyses Australian Bureau of Statistics employment data to show that cultural work in Australia is poorly paid, unequal, insecure and precarious. Adopting a political economy analysis, we argue that social, cultural and industry policy settings favour large firms at the expense of artists and cultural workers. In response, we propose a number of policy interventions. It is possible to re-imagine a world of cultural work in which strong cultural, social and employment protections allow artists and cultural workers a dignified creative life.

Journal of sociologyVol. 61(3)
Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Artists as workers’? Re-imagining cultural policy for insecure and precarious artists and cultural workers — Benjamin Carl Eltham, Xin Gu, et al. · Journal of sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS