Anthropocene feminism and the Weird temporalities of landscape

This article presents an overview of the topic I have been exploring in recent years – the role of landscape in contemporary British women’s fiction. Here I focus specifically on the use of the short story in relation to temporality and the Anthropocene. In discussing stories by Zoe Gilbert, Sarah Hall, Daisy Johnson and Lucy Wood, I contextualize them within what has been termed as ‘Anthropocene feminism’, which regards the effects of climate change and species loss as man-made, and posits a posthuman future after the end of patriarchy. As the first section argues, this revolutionary project is in sharp contrast with the melancholia that underwrites the work of critics such as Mark Fisher, Robert Macfarlane and Adam Scovell. Instead, I argue that it has much more in common with how China Miéville understands the Weird in non-hauntological, ‘abcanny’ terms. The second section applies this critical vocabulary to short fiction and demonstrates how it describes patriarchy as moribund, visualizes landscape and the natural world in non-anthropocentric terms, utilizes Weird temporal effects and figures a posthuman future at the expense of animal and sexual differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Short Fiction in Theory and Practice
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/fict_00122_1
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropocene feminism and the Weird temporalities of landscape

Paul March‐Russell
Short Fiction in Theory and Practice
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Anthropocene feminism and the Weird temporalities of landscape

Paul March‐Russell
article en

Abstract

This article presents an overview of the topic I have been exploring in recent years – the role of landscape in contemporary British women’s fiction. Here I focus specifically on the use of the short story in relation to temporality and the Anthropocene. In discussing stories by Zoe Gilbert, Sarah Hall, Daisy Johnson and Lucy Wood, I contextualize them within what has been termed as ‘Anthropocene feminism’, which regards the effects of climate change and species loss as man-made, and posits a posthuman future after the end of patriarchy. As the first section argues, this revolutionary project is in sharp contrast with the melancholia that underwrites the work of critics such as Mark Fisher, Robert Macfarlane and Adam Scovell. Instead, I argue that it has much more in common with how China Miéville understands the Weird in non-hauntological, ‘abcanny’ terms. The second section applies this critical vocabulary to short fiction and demonstrates how it describes patriarchy as moribund, visualizes landscape and the natural world in non-anthropocentric terms, utilizes Weird temporal effects and figures a posthuman future at the expense of animal and sexual differences.

Short Fiction in Theory and PracticeVol. 15(1)
Film Independent (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anthropocene feminism and the Weird temporalities of landscape — Paul March‐Russell · Short Fiction in Theory and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS