The work that «stepped over» the epoch: The Third Symphony by Yuri N. Shishakov

The article is devoted to the Third Symphony for Russian Folk Instruments Orchestra by Yuri Nikolayevich Shishakov. It notes the continuity with the composers of the Russian symphonic school (symphonies by Borodin, Taneyev, Glazunov, Tchaikovsky and Prokofiev), which is reflected in the appeal to traditional models and genres (epic-narrative sonata-symphonic cycle with the use of a synthesising finale), methods of development (a combination of sonata and variation) and imagery (bell-like, skomoroschestvo). The question of the universality of Russian folk instruments and their adaptation to the symphonic genre posed by the composer is examined. Such symphonic principles as leitintonality and monothematism are traced. The influence of Shostakovich’s symphonic model and writing technique is noted, manifested not only in allusions to certain themes, but also in the commonality of images, ideas, drama, principles of form and orchestration. The specifics of the composer’s orchestral writing are studied, which is connected with the enrichment of the sonic palette of the work, the search for new means of sound writing, the juxtaposition of orchestral groups, and finding a balance between solo conducting and duplication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ученые записки Российской академии музыки имени Гнесиных
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56620/2227-9997-2025-2-63-78
Primary Topic
Diverse Musicological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The work that «stepped over» the epoch: The Third Symphony by Yuri N. Shishakov

Еkaterina V. Маkartseva
Ученые записки Российской академии музыки имени Гнесиных
Diverse Musicological Studies
article

The work that «stepped over» the epoch: The Third Symphony by Yuri N. Shishakov

Еkaterina V. Маkartseva
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the Third Symphony for Russian Folk Instruments Orchestra by Yuri Nikolayevich Shishakov. It notes the continuity with the composers of the Russian symphonic school (symphonies by Borodin, Taneyev, Glazunov, Tchaikovsky and Prokofiev), which is reflected in the appeal to traditional models and genres (epic-narrative sonata-symphonic cycle with the use of a synthesising finale), methods of development (a combination of sonata and variation) and imagery (bell-like, skomoroschestvo). The question of the universality of Russian folk instruments and their adaptation to the symphonic genre posed by the composer is examined. Such symphonic principles as leitintonality and monothematism are traced. The influence of Shostakovich’s symphonic model and writing technique is noted, manifested not only in allusions to certain themes, but also in the commonality of images, ideas, drama, principles of form and orchestration. The specifics of the composer’s orchestral writing are studied, which is connected with the enrichment of the sonic palette of the work, the search for new means of sound writing, the juxtaposition of orchestral groups, and finding a balance between solo conducting and duplication.

Ученые записки Российской академии музыки имени ГнесиныхVol. 2(53)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Diverse Musicological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.