Inadequacy of Weaker Party Protection in Relation to Substantive Equality: A Capabilities Approach to Grounds for Discrimination and the Privatization of Disability Services*

This article explores how status-based roles embraced in private law may lead to unfair situations in which the role of a stronger party is given to an individual, for example a person with disabilities, who is unable to carry out the duties associated with this role accordingly. This is particularly obvious and problematic when fundamental care services are privatized. We draw on the normative capability approach, proposed by Martha Nussbaum, in arguing that grounds for discrimination should also play a role in the sphere of private contracting. The commitment to substantive equality inevitably requires that the scope of grounds for discrimination should extend beyond their traditional role, which is limited to the evaluation and establishment of prohibited unfavourable treatment under non-discrimination law. We discuss the employer model laid down in the Finnish Act on Disability Services and Assistance and two interconnected decisions given by the Supreme Court on the application of the legislation to demonstrate the blind spots of private law with respect to grounds for discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Human Rights
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2025.2509203
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inadequacy of Weaker Party Protection in Relation to Substantive Equality: A Capabilities Approach to Grounds for Discrimination and the Privatization of Disability Services*

Katja Karjalainen, Mia Hoffrén, Marjo Ylhäinen
Nordic Journal of Human Rights
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

Inadequacy of Weaker Party Protection in Relation to Substantive Equality: A Capabilities Approach to Grounds for Discrimination and the Privatization of Disability Services*

Katja Karjalainen, Mia Hoffrén, Marjo Ylhäinen
article en

Abstract

This article explores how status-based roles embraced in private law may lead to unfair situations in which the role of a stronger party is given to an individual, for example a person with disabilities, who is unable to carry out the duties associated with this role accordingly. This is particularly obvious and problematic when fundamental care services are privatized. We draw on the normative capability approach, proposed by Martha Nussbaum, in arguing that grounds for discrimination should also play a role in the sphere of private contracting. The commitment to substantive equality inevitably requires that the scope of grounds for discrimination should extend beyond their traditional role, which is limited to the evaluation and establishment of prohibited unfavourable treatment under non-discrimination law. We discuss the employer model laid down in the Finnish Act on Disability Services and Assistance and two interconnected decisions given by the Supreme Court on the application of the legislation to demonstrate the blind spots of private law with respect to grounds for discrimination.

Nordic Journal of Human RightsVol. 43(2)
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Lapland University of Applied Sciences (FI), Finland University (FI), University of Lapland (FI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.