A Typology Proposal for Innovation Hubs

Innovation Hubs (IHs) catalyse open innovation and technology transfer within innovation ecosystems (IEs). IHs offer physical as well as virtual structures that enhance innovation. IHs around the world have different dynamics. They differ in terms of their characteristics, activities, and objectives, requiring distinctive forms of management and orchestration adapted to their realities. Thus, to subsidise universities, policy-makers and ecosystem orchestrators, we carried out a meta-synthesis, guided by the paradigm of Design Science Research, to identify IHs typologies. Recognising typologies and their dynamics reduces trial and error in the design, management and orchestration of IHs, increasing their performance. In this article, we present six typologies of IHs based on their dynamics and the class of priority problems they address: corporate, university, government, accelerators, co-working, and thematic. We also seek to explore connections between the typologies and the actors involved in the activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation Management
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_012.004_0001
Citations
3
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Typology Proposal for Innovation Hubs

Débora Oliveira da Silva, Kadígia Faccin, D. M. Pinheiro
3 citations
Journal of Innovation Management
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
8.28
article

A Typology Proposal for Innovation Hubs

Débora Oliveira da Silva, Kadígia Faccin, D. M. Pinheiro
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Innovation Hubs (IHs) catalyse open innovation and technology transfer within innovation ecosystems (IEs). IHs offer physical as well as virtual structures that enhance innovation. IHs around the world have different dynamics. They differ in terms of their characteristics, activities, and objectives, requiring distinctive forms of management and orchestration adapted to their realities. Thus, to subsidise universities, policy-makers and ecosystem orchestrators, we carried out a meta-synthesis, guided by the paradigm of Design Science Research, to identify IHs typologies. Recognising typologies and their dynamics reduces trial and error in the design, management and orchestration of IHs, increasing their performance. In this article, we present six typologies of IHs based on their dynamics and the class of priority problems they address: corporate, university, government, accelerators, co-working, and thematic. We also seek to explore connections between the typologies and the actors involved in the activities.

Journal of Innovation ManagementVol. 12(4)
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR), Fundação Dom Cabral (BR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
8.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Typology Proposal for Innovation Hubs — Débora Oliveira da Silva, Kadígia Faccin, et al. · Journal of Innovation Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS