Sustainable AI Solutions for Empowering Visually Impaired Students: The Role of Assistive Technologies in Academic Success

This paper examines the impacts of AI-powered assistive technologies (AIATs) on the academic success of higher education university students with visual impairments. As digital learning contexts become progressively more prevalent in higher education institutions, it is critical to understand how these technologies foster the academic success of university students with blindness or low vision. Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the study conducted a quantitative research approach and collected data from 390 visually impaired students who were enrolled in different universities across Saudi Arabia (SA). Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the paper tested the influences of four UTAUT dimensions—Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), and Facilitating Conditions (FC)—on Academic Performance (AP), while also evaluating the mediating role of Behavioral Intention (BI). The results revealed a significant positive relationship between the implementation of AI-based assistive tools and students’ academic success. Particularly, BI emerged as a key mediator in these intersections. The results indicated that PE (β = 0.137, R2 = 0.745), SI (β = 0.070, R2 = 0.745), and BI (β = 0.792, R2 = 0.745) significantly affected AP. In contrast, EE (β = −0.041, R2 = 0.745) and FC (β = −0.004, R2 = 0.745) did not have a significant effect on AP. Concerning predictors of BI, PE (β = 0.412, R2 = 0.317), SI (β = 0.462, R2 = 0.317), and EE (β = 0.139, R2 = 0.317) were all positively associated with BI. However, FC had a significant negative association with BI (β = −0.194, R2 = 0.317). Additionally, the analysis revealed that EE, SI, and PE can all indirectly enhance Academic Performance by influencing BI. The findings provide practical insights for higher education policymakers, higher education administrators, and AI designers, emphasizing the need to improve the accessibility and usability of sustainable and long-term assistive technologies to better accommodate learners with visual impairments in higher education contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125609
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
66.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable AI Solutions for Empowering Visually Impaired Students: The Role of Assistive Technologies in Academic Success

Sameer M. AlNajdi, Ibrahim Abdelhamid Elshaer, Mostafa Aboulnour Salem
16 citations
Sustainability
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
66.70
article

Sustainable AI Solutions for Empowering Visually Impaired Students: The Role of Assistive Technologies in Academic Success

Sameer M. AlNajdi, Ibrahim Abdelhamid Elshaer, Mostafa Aboulnour Salem
article en
16 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the impacts of AI-powered assistive technologies (AIATs) on the academic success of higher education university students with visual impairments. As digital learning contexts become progressively more prevalent in higher education institutions, it is critical to understand how these technologies foster the academic success of university students with blindness or low vision. Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the study conducted a quantitative research approach and collected data from 390 visually impaired students who were enrolled in different universities across Saudi Arabia (SA). Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the paper tested the influences of four UTAUT dimensions—Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), and Facilitating Conditions (FC)—on Academic Performance (AP), while also evaluating the mediating role of Behavioral Intention (BI). The results revealed a significant positive relationship between the implementation of AI-based assistive tools and students’ academic success. Particularly, BI emerged as a key mediator in these intersections. The results indicated that PE (β = 0.137, R2 = 0.745), SI (β = 0.070, R2 = 0.745), and BI (β = 0.792, R2 = 0.745) significantly affected AP. In contrast, EE (β = −0.041, R2 = 0.745) and FC (β = −0.004, R2 = 0.745) did not have a significant effect on AP. Concerning predictors of BI, PE (β = 0.412, R2 = 0.317), SI (β = 0.462, R2 = 0.317), and EE (β = 0.139, R2 = 0.317) were all positively associated with BI. However, FC had a significant negative association with BI (β = −0.194, R2 = 0.317). Additionally, the analysis revealed that EE, SI, and PE can all indirectly enhance Academic Performance by influencing BI. The findings provide practical insights for higher education policymakers, higher education administrators, and AI designers, emphasizing the need to improve the accessibility and usability of sustainable and long-term assistive technologies to better accommodate learners with visual impairments in higher education contexts.

SustainabilityVol. 17(12)
King Salman Center for Disability Research (SA), King Faisal University (SA), University of Tabuk (SA)
King Salman Center for Disability Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
66.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.